ORCID
- Husk, Kerryn: 0000-0001-5674-8673
- Elston, Julian: 0000-0003-1378-5030
- Gradinger, Felix: 0000-0001-8335-4047
- Callaghan, Lynne: 0000-0002-0766-645X
- Asthana, Sheena: 0000-0002-1483-2719
Abstract
Social prescribing is the topic of the moment. Many national organisations and individuals from policy, practice, and academia (such as NHS England, the RCGP, the Mayor of London, and National Institute for Health Research) are rightly advocating social prescriptions as an important way to expand the options available for GPs and other community-based practitioners to provide individualised care for people’s physical and mental health through social interventions. No robust figures exist but it is thought that around 20% of patients consult their GP for primarily social issues, given this and the driving forces of an ageing population, increased complex health and social needs, and increasing demand on services, social prescribing is rapidly gaining popularity.As a concept and a model for delivering health and social interventions, social prescribing has proliferated without a concomitant evidence base.1 This is partly due to resource limitations on evaluators and partly due to difficulties in conceptualising what social prescribing is and what good evidence for a complex service might look like. Here, we briefly outline different models of social prescribing, the current evidence base and its limitations, explore problems relating to what constitutes good evidence, and discuss some potential ways forward.An immediate difficulty is the range of activity that the term ‘social prescribing’ embraces. Such heterogeneity is a function of social prescribing being the demand-driven formalisation of referrals to existing community services and organisations, which is necessarily locally different. More generally, at one extreme there are narrow interventions that focus on one clinical area and aim to prevent or reduce progression to chronic disease. Such interventions tend to include targeted life-style interventions (for example physical activity, healthy eating or cooking), medicines management or group mentoring, and are typically accessed through the healthcare system. At the other extreme, a large number of schemes are …
DOI
10.3399/bjgp19X700325
Publication Date
2019-01-01
Publication Title
British Journal of General Practice
Volume
69
Issue
678
ISSN
0960-1643
Embargo Period
2019-12-27
Organisational Unit
Peninsula Medical School
First Page
6
Last Page
7
Recommended Citation
Husk, K., Elston, J., Gradinger, F., Callaghan, L., & Asthana, S. (2019) 'Social prescribing: where is the evidence? Commissioned editorial', British Journal of General Practice, 69(678), pp. 6-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X700325
