ORCID

Abstract

Marginal utility (MU) theories of consumer demand assume that consumers try to maximise a generic benefit (‘utility’) by selecting purchases giving equal marginal utility per unit of cost, from which are predicted the observed relationships between price changes and quantities of demanded consumer goods. Attempts to remedy the explanatory shortcomings of MU theory usually supplement it with additional assumptions. This paper proposes taking that approach to its logical conclusion by using consumer and psychological research findings not to supplement but to replace the concept of utility entirely with realistic explanations of consumer behaviour.

DOI

10.1017/S1744137424000353

Publication Date

2025-03-05

Publication Title

Journal of Institutional Economics

Volume

21

Issue

e7

ISSN

1744-1374

First Page

1

Last Page

20

Share

COinS