ORCID
- Rohit Shankar: 0000-0002-1183-6933
Abstract
Background Adults with learning disability face multiple adversities, but evidence on their needs and primary care experiences is limited. Aim To compare the characteristics and primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not. Design and setting An analysis of the 2022 General Practice Patient Survey, a national probability sample survey conducted in 2022 with people registered with NHS primary care in England. Method This analysis reports descriptive profiles, weighted and with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression models adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, and area-level deprivation compared experiences of adults reporting learning disability with those who did not. Results Survey participants comprised 623,157 people aged 16 or older, including 6,711 reporting learning disability. Adults reporting learning disability were more likely to be male, younger, of mixed or multiple ethnicities, and live in more deprived areas. All chronic conditions included in the survey were more common in adults reporting learning disability, especially reported sensory, neurodevelopmental, neurological, and mental health conditions. Adults reporting learning disability were twice as likely to have a preferred GP, and less likely to find their practice’s website easy to navigate. They were also less likely to have confidence and trust in their healthcare professional, or feel their needs were met. Conclusion Adults reporting a learning disability had a higher likelihood of chronic health conditions. Their reported experiences of primary care indicate that despite recent initiatives to improve services offered, further adaptations to the consistency and ease of access to primary care is needed.
DOI
10.3399/BJGP.2024.0056
Publication Date
2024-10-07
Publication Title
British Journal of General Practice
ISSN
0960-1643
Recommended Citation
Shankar, R. (2024) 'Primary care experiences of adults reporting learning disability: a probability sample survey', British Journal of General Practice, . Available at: https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0056