Authors

David N. Naumann, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
BEACON Collaborative
Aneel Bhangu, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Adam Brooks, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Matthew Martin, LAC+USC Medical Center
Bryan A. Cotton, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Mansoor Khan, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Mark J. Midwinter, University of Queensland
Lyndsay Pearce, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group
Douglas M. Bowley, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
John B. Holcomb, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Ewen A. Griffiths, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Adam Abu-Abeid, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Adam Peckham-Cooper, Leeds Institute of Emergency General Surgery
Adam R. Dyas, University of Colorado Denver
Ademola Adeyeye, Afe Babalola University
Agron Dogjani, University of Medicine of Tirana
Alasdair C.Y. Ball, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Albert M. Wolthuis, KU Leuven
Alejandro Quiroga-Garza, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
Aleksandar R. Karamarkovic, University of Belgrade
Alessio Giordano, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
Alexander Fuchs, University of Bern
Alexander Julianov, Trakia Hospital
Alexander W. Phillips, Northern Oesophagogastric Unit
Alexander Zimmermann, University of Zurich
Alexandros Charalabopoulos, Laiko Hospital
Alexei A. Birkun, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas, University of Miami
Ali Guner, Karadeniz Technical University

Abstract

Background: Textbook outcomes are composite outcome measures that reflect the ideal overall experience for patients. There are many of these in the elective surgery literature but no textbook outcomes have been proposed for patients following emergency laparotomy. The aim was to achieve international consensus amongst experts and patients for the best Textbook Outcomes for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. Methods: A modified Delphi exercise was undertaken with three planned rounds to achieve consensus regarding the best Textbook Outcomes based on the category, number and importance (Likert scale of 1–5) of individual outcome measures. There were separate questions for non-trauma and trauma. A patient engagement exercise was undertaken after round 2 to inform the final round. Results: A total of 337 participants from 53 countries participated in all three rounds of the exercise. The final Textbook Outcomes were divided into ‘early’ and ‘longer-term’. For non-trauma patients the proposed early Textbook Outcome was ‘Discharged from hospital without serious postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation or death). For trauma patients it was ‘Discharged from hospital without unexpected transfusion after haemostasis, and no serious postoperative complications (adapted Clavien–Dindo for trauma ≥ grade III; including intra-abdominal sepsis, organ failure, unplanned re-operation on or death)’. The longer-term Textbook Outcome for both non-trauma and trauma was ‘Achieved the early Textbook Outcome, and restoration of baseline quality of life at 1 year’. Conclusion: Early and longer-term Textbook Outcomes have been agreed by an international consensus of experts for non-trauma and trauma emergency laparotomy. These now require clinical validation with patient data.

DOI

10.1093/bjsopen/zrad145

Publication Date

2024-02-01

Publication Title

BJS Open

Volume

8

Issue

1

Keywords

Humans, Laparotomy/adverse effects, Quality of Life, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Sepsis, Postoperative Complications

Share

COinS