ORCID
- Rohit Shankar: 0000-0002-1183-6933
Abstract
Genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of epilepsy in >50% of cases, and information on the use of antiseizure medications in people with specific aetiologies will help guide treatment decisions. The PERMIT Extension study pooled data from two real-world studies (PERMIT and PROVE) to investigate the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat people with focal and generalised epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. This post-hoc analysis of PERMIT Extension explored the use of PER when used to treat individuals presumed to have epilepsy with a genetic aetiology. Assessments included retention rate (evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months), effectiveness (responder and seizure freedom rates; evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and the last visit [last observation carried forward) and tolerability (adverse events [AEs]). Of the 6822 people with epilepsy included in PERMIT Extension, 1012 were presumed to have a genetic aetiology. The most common genetic aetiologies were idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; 58.2%), tuberous sclerosis (1.1%), Dravet syndrome (0.8%) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+; 0.5%). Retention rates at 3, 6 and 12 months in the total genetic aetiology population were 89.3%, 79.7% and 65.9%, respectively. In the total genetic aetiology population, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were 74.8% and 68.3%, respectively, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 48.9% and 46.5%, respectively. For the specific aetiology subgroups, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were, respectively: 90.4% and 84.4% (IGE), 100% and 57.1% (tuberous sclerosis), 100% and 71.4% (Dravet syndrome), and 33.3% and 20.0% (GEFS+). Corresponding seizure freedom rates were, respectively: 73.1% and 64.6% (IGE), 33.3% and 22.2% (tuberous sclerosis), 20.0% and 28.6% (Dravet syndrome), and 0% and 0% (GEFS+). The incidence of AEs was 46.5% for the total genetic aetiology population, 48.8% for IGE, 27.3% for tuberous sclerosis, 62.5% for Dravet syndrome, and 20% for GEFS+. Tolerability findings were consistent with PER's known safety profile. PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used in individuals with a presumed genetic epilepsy aetiology in clinical practice. PER was effective across a wide range of genetic aetiologies.
Publication Date
2024-03-02
Publication Title
Epilepsy Research
Volume
202
ISSN
0920-1211
Keywords
Epilepsy, Epilepsy syndrome, Genetic etiology, Idiopathic generalized epilepsy, Perampanel, Real-world, Pyridones/therapeutic use, Epilepsy, Generalized/drug therapy, Humans, Middle Aged, Nitriles/therapeutic use, Child, Preschool, Male, Treatment Outcome, Tuberous Sclerosis/genetics, Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use, Young Adult, Epilepsy/drug therapy, Adolescent, Female, Adult, Aged, Child
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Delanty, N., Mohanraj, R., Shankar, R., Wehner, T., Stephen, L., D'Souza, W., Cappucci, S., McMurray, R., Sainz-Fuertes, R., & Villanueva, V. (2024) 'Perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy with genetic aetiology: Real-world evidence from the PERMIT Extension study', Epilepsy Research, 202. Retrieved from https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/pms-research/1068