ORCID
- N Pratt: 0000-0002-7112-7792
Abstract
Recent policy reforms to the national assessment system in England have altered the way in which teachers undertake assessment. Through an analysis of data from a small-scale interview study with eleven primary teachers in the south and east of England, we examine the ways in which teachers work with assessment software to monitor and track attainment. By employing a theoretical lens focusing on power and implementing an analytics of government, we illuminate the visualizing effects of whole class digital assessment grids. A prominent feature across the data set is the use of the language of ‘gaps’ in relation to the teaching and assessment of mathematics. We argue that digital assessment tools act as technologies of power and of the self which shape teachers’ practices, their identities, how they position children as learners, but also shape the nature of the subject of mathematics itself. It is important to better understand assessment software in education and the discourses in which it operates in order to recognise what is at stake for teaching, learning and curriculum.
Publication Date
2021-06-04
Publication Title
Critical Studies in Education
Volume
63
Issue
4
ISSN
1750-8487
Embargo Period
2022-12-04
Keywords
analytics of government, assessment software, gaps, governmentality, mathematics education
First Page
501
Last Page
515
Recommended Citation
Alderton, J., & Pratt, N. (2021) 'Filling gaps: assessment software and the production of mathematics and its teaching and learning in primary schools', Critical Studies in Education, 63(4), pp. 501-515. Available at: 10.1080/17508487.2021.1917435