ORCID

Abstract

Delivering ethical collaborative research is challenging, requiring disruption of assumptions, academic norms, and ways of working–including long-standing power dynamics. This article proposes a framework to support critical reflection on participatory practice; an adaptation of the wheel of consent. The adapted ‘ILBR’ framework explores the balance of who Initiates (makes requests/offers), does Labour (the action), gets Benefits, and takes on Risks (ILBR) in the conduct of research. This aims to support reflexive design and delivery of ethical participation, including a shift towards consent becoming an ongoing multi-way negotiation of agreements. Particularly it aims to support ‘interpersonal reflexivity’, and navigation of the ‘micro-ethics’ present during everyday-level interactions. The framework was tested for individual reflection and as an educational role-play exercise. Explorations indicate managing power and positionality need consideration, and future research should explore how to make space for more requests.

Publication Date

2025-07-29

Publication Title

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Acceptance Date

2025-07-14

Deposit Date

2025-07-15

Funding

We are grateful to Betty Martin and Rupert Alison for supporting concept development, Rebecca Sarah Ciarla, Yve Ashton and others who supported workshops, and to all those who engaged to offer feedback and suggestions. This research was delivered as part of a PhD funded internally by the University of Plymouth (UK).

Keywords

Participation, co-production, collaboration, engagement, ethics

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS