Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RM
dc.contributor.authorFern, LA
dc.contributor.authorSolanki, A
dc.contributor.authorHooker, L
dc.contributor.authorCarluccio, A
dc.contributor.authorPye, J
dc.contributor.authorJeans, D
dc.contributor.authorFrere–Smith, T
dc.contributor.authorGibson, F
dc.contributor.authorBarber, J
dc.contributor.authorRaine, R
dc.contributor.authorStark, D
dc.contributor.authorFeltbower, R
dc.contributor.authorpearce, susie
dc.contributor.authorWhelan, JS
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T11:50:19Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T11:50:19Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.issn1477-7525
dc.identifier.other107
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9333
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is increasingly used as an indicator of high quality care in addition to more traditional clinical end-points. Surveys are generally accepted as appropriate methodology to capture patient experience. No validated patient experience surveys exist specifically for adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 13-24 years at diagnosis with cancer. This paper describes early work undertaken to develop and validate a descriptive patient experience survey for AYA with cancer that encompasses both their cancer experience and age-related issues. We aimed to develop, with young people, an experience survey meaningful and relevant to AYA to be used in a longitudinal cohort study (BRIGHTLIGHT), ensuring high levels of acceptability to maximise study retention. METHODS: A three-stage approach was employed: Stage 1 involved developing a conceptual framework, conducting literature/Internet searches and establishing content validity of the survey; Stage 2 confirmed the acceptability of methods of administration and consisted of four focus groups involving 11 young people (14-25 years), three parents and two siblings; and Stage 3 established survey comprehension through telephone-administered cognitive interviews with a convenience sample of 23 young people aged 14-24 years. RESULT: Stage 1: Two-hundred and thirty eight questions were developed from qualitative reports of young people's cancer and treatment-related experience. Stage 2: The focus groups identified three core themes: (i) issues directly affecting young people, e.g. impact of treatment-related fatigue on ability to complete survey; (ii) issues relevant to the actual survey, e.g. ability to answer questions anonymously; (iii) administration issues, e.g. confusing format in some supporting documents. Stage 3: Cognitive interviews indicated high levels of comprehension requiring minor survey amendments. CONCLUSION: Collaborating with young people with cancer has enabled a survey of to be developed that is both meaningful to young people but also examines patient experience and outcomes associated with specialist cancer care. Engagement of young people throughout the survey development has ensured the content appropriately reflects their experience and is easily understood. The BRIGHTLIGHT survey was developed for a specific research project but has the potential to be used as a TYA cancer survey to assess patient experience and the care they receive.

dc.format.extent0-0
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectTeenager
dc.subjectYoung adult
dc.subjectCancer
dc.subjectExperience
dc.subjectBRIGHTLIGHT
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of the BRIGHTLIGHT Survey, a patient-reported experience measure for young people with cancer
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeEvaluation Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.typeValidation Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000358472600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume13
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12955-015-0312-7
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-07-22
dc.identifier.eissn1477-7525
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12955-015-0312-7
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV