Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPepose, JS
dc.contributor.authorHayashida, J
dc.contributor.authorHovanesian, J
dc.contributor.authorDavies, J
dc.contributor.authorLabor, PK
dc.contributor.authorWhitman, J
dc.contributor.authorCarter, H
dc.contributor.authorColvard, M
dc.contributor.authorBuckhurst, P
dc.contributor.authorKhodai, O
dc.contributor.authorMittleman, D
dc.contributor.authorFeinerman, G
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-04T12:10:11Z
dc.date.available2017-05-04T12:10:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9187
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Trulign toric intraocular lens (IOL) in adults with cataract. SETTING: Eight private practices in the United States and 1 in Canada. DESIGN: Prospective randomized single-masked multicenter study. METHODS: A toric IOL (1.25 D, 2.00 D, or 2.75 D, determined by a toric calculator) was implanted in eligible patients with age-related cataract requiring a 16.00 to 27.00 diopter (D) spherical IOL power and with a predicted postoperative astigmatism of 0.83 to 2.50 D. Eyes within the lowest cylinder range (predicted postoperative astigmatism 0.83 to 1.32 D) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the 1.25 D toric IOL group and the nontoric accommodating IOL (Crystalens) control group. RESULTS: The toric 1.25 D group had a statistically significantly greater percentage reduction in absolute cylinder (P < .001) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .002) than the control group at the 120- to 180-day visit. The mean monocular uncorrected vision at distance, intermediate, and near was 20/25, 20/22, and 20/39, respectively, with the 1.25 D, 2.00 D, and 2.75 D toric IOLs in aggregate (toric group). In addition, 96.1% of patients (123/128) had 5.0 degrees or less absolute IOL rotation postoperatively. Regarding safety, the endpoints for preservation of corrected visual acuity and the incidence of complications and adverse events were met. CONCLUSION: The toric IOL was safe and effective in reducing the effects of preoperative corneal astigmatism and provided excellent uncorrected distance and intermediate vision and functional near vision. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES: Dr. Pepose is a consultant to Bausch & Lomb and was medical monitor of this study. Drs. Buckhurst, Whitman, Feinerman, Hovanesian, Davies, Labor, and Carter are consultants to Bausch & Lomb. At the time of the study, Drs. Hayashida, and Khodai were employees of Bausch & Lomb. Drs. Colvard and Mittleman have financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

dc.format.extent295-305
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAstigmatism
dc.subjectBiocompatible Materials
dc.subjectCataract
dc.subjectEquipment Safety
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLens Implantation, Intraocular
dc.subjectLenses, Intraocular
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPhacoemulsification
dc.subjectPresbyopia
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectProsthesis Design
dc.subjectRefraction, Ocular
dc.subjectSilicone Elastomers
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectVisual Acuity
dc.titleSafety and effectiveness of a new toric presbyopia-correcting posterior chamber silicone intraocular lens
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000350329700008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume41
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.043
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-05-19
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4502
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.043
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV