Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Abigail
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T08:58:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:37:22Z
dc.date.available2017-04-03T08:58:38Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citation

Saunders, A. (2016) ' The Animals Act 1971 Places a Disproportionate Burden on the Keepers of Animals and is in Need of Reform', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 8, pp. 199-217. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9030

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9030
dc.description.abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine whether the Animals Act 1971 places a disproportionate burden on the keepers of animals and whether it is in need of reform. The law prior to the Act will be considered in order to identify the problems that led to the current law. An analysis of the application of the Act and the case law follows to identify any problems with the current law. This paper will also focus specifically on damage caused by horse riding accidents due to the fact that it is a high risk sport and injuries will arise. Finally the attempts to reform the Act will be discussed in order to come to a conclusion as to whether reform continues to be necessary.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAnimals Act 1971en_US
dc.subjectliability of animal keepers and ownersen_US
dc.subjecthorsesen_US
dc.titleThe Animals Act 1971 Places a Disproportionate Burden on the Keepers of Animals and is in Need of Reformen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV