Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirton, James
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T11:09:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:33:27Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T11:09:05Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:33:27Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation

Kirton, J. (2015) '‘The Only Game in Town’ – But is it a Legal One? American Drone Strikes and International Law', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 7, pp. 77-112. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9023

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9023
dc.description.abstract

In 2002 a US Predator drone operating above Afghanistan’s Paktia province spotted three men in Zhawar Kili, a complex slightly north of the infamous Tora Bora cave system, an area used by al-Qaeda leadership to train and regroup. One of the men was tall; supposedly the others were acting reverently towards him. Convinced the tall man was Osama bin Laden a Hellfire missile was fired from the Predator, killing all three men instantly. The tall man was not bin Laden. None of the men were even affiliated with al-Qaeda or the Taliban; they were simply civilians in the wrong place at the wrong time. This strike and many others that are all too similar raise a multitude of questions, both legal and moral, regarding the US lethal drone strike programme. This article attempts to examine the legal implications of US drone strikes; not only in Afghanistan, but further afield from the more traditional and accepted battlefields in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectdroneen_US
dc.subjectUAVen_US
dc.subjectarmed conflicten_US
dc.subjectjus in belloen_US
dc.subjectjus ad bellumen_US
dc.subjectinternational human rights lawen_US
dc.subjectal-Qaedaen_US
dc.title‘The Only Game in Town’ – But is it a Legal One? American Drone Strikes and International Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV