Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerrin, Harry
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T10:38:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:30:21Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T10:38:27Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:30:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citation

Perrin, H. (2014) 'Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): An Overview of Some Common Mechanisms, and their Strengths and Weaknesses in Context', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 6, pp. 70-79. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/9006

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/9006
dc.description.abstract

Alternative Dispute Resolution, or ’ADR’, offers parties in dispute an alternative to traditional court-based litigation, which is often seen as slow, costly and ineffective. ADR frequently involves a neutral third party who will settle or facilitate resolution of the dispute. This paper examines three common ADR mechanisms, adjudication, arbitration and mediation, and.explores their relative advantages and disadvantages in different contexts.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAlternative Dispute Resolutionen_US
dc.subjectADRen_US
dc.subjectadjudicationen_US
dc.subjectconstruction adjudicationen_US
dc.subjectarbitrationen_US
dc.subjectmediationen_US
dc.subjectnegotiationen_US
dc.titleAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): An Overview of Some Common Mechanisms, and their Strengths and Weaknesses in Contexten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume6
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV