Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHocking, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-29T10:50:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T11:30:16Z
dc.date.available2017-03-29T10:50:30Z
dc.date.available2017-04-11T11:30:16Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citation

Hocking, S. (2014) 'Re)Settlement? Transitions from Custody to Community for Socially Excluded Children and Young People', Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 6, pp. 192-213. Available at: https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/8998

en_US
dc.identifier.issn2054-149X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/8998
dc.description.abstract

Despite recent declines in the use of custody for children and young people, reoffending rates for this age group remain notoriously high at over seventy per cent (Ministry of Justice, 2013) and their aftercare or resettlement support is consistently criticised for failing to address their complex needs. However with recent resettlement developments promising ‘enhanced’ and intensive provision, this article seeks to explore this using findings from semi-structured interviews and documentary analysis. Making particular use of Levitas et al.’s (2007) conceptualisation of social exclusion, this article provides a discussion of the resettlement needs of young custody leavers and an evaluation of current provision and its ability to address such needs. Despite some promising findings, the article shows that there are still inherent failures to meet all young people’s complex inclusionary needs. It is argued this is because programmes continue to provide superficial support in ‘job readiness’ and tackling cognitive deficits rather than addressing the poor structure of opportunities and the deep and interacting expressions of inequality facing young people who offend. It is also argued that resettlement attempts consistently fail to recognise that young people’s ‘settlement’ in the first place is highly questionable. Therefore, it is concluded that for resettlement attempts to be more successful, they need to adjust their mission to one of intensive inclusion and perhaps ‘starting from scratch’. Fundamentally though, it is argued that both resettlement attempts and society need to more fully acknowledge that young people who offend are in every sense children in need.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectyouth justiceen_US
dc.subjectdesistanceen_US
dc.subjectresettlementen_US
dc.subjectsocial exclusionen_US
dc.title(Re)Settlement? Transitions from Custody to Community for Socially Excluded Children and Young Peopleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.volume6
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV