Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreeman, E
dc.contributor.authorAkhurst, J
dc.contributor.authorBannigan, K
dc.contributor.authorJames, H
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-15T22:31:21Z
dc.date.available2016-08-15T22:31:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-17
dc.identifier.issn0957-4824
dc.identifier.issn1460-2245
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5303
dc.description.abstract

This paper examines human-nature interaction and how therapeutic this relationship is by investigating the efficacy of structured outdoor experience. Two walking and solo experience (WSEs) explored university students' (aged 20-43 years) perceptions of walking through and being with nature. The first was a 5-day journey (n = 4; 3 females and 1 male) and the second (n = 5; 3 females and 2 males) took place over two weekends, with a 2-week interval in-between. Pre- and post-experience interviews, journal writing, group discussions and a 9-month follow-up interviews were used to collect data and thematic analysis [Braun and Clarke (Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.)] was applied. Both WSEs were considered together during analysis, as well as comparisons made between the two, in order to evaluate implications for practice. Benefits of the WSE that contributed to a general sense of well-being were: (i) gaining a sense of freedom and escape; (ii) gaining a sense of awareness and sensitivity to one's environment and its influence (iii) gaining confidence in being able to cope and take action; (iv) gaining a sense of perspective on and appreciation for life. Furthermore, the meaning participants formed in relation to their environment before, during and after the WSE, and the activity within that environment, played a role in their sense of well-being and in their motivations to re-access nature in other places. Findings suggest that WSEs are a cost effective way to give rise to beneficial and durable experiences, but a more holistic approach to policy is needed.

dc.format.extentdaw036-daw036
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)
dc.subjectwell-being
dc.subjectenvironment and public health
dc.titleBenefits of walking and solo experiences in UK wild places
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27190225
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume32
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalHealth Promotion International
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/heapro/daw036
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-03-20
dc.rights.embargodate2017-05-17
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2245
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/heapro/daw036
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-05-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV