Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIckert, Jen
dc.contributor.authorStewart, ISen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-26T15:56:42Z
dc.date.available2016-07-26T15:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-23en
dc.identifier.issn1561-8633en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/5115
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 Author(s). An important paradox of hazard communication is that the more effectively a potential physical threat is made public by the scientist, the more readily the scientific message becomes normalized into the daily discourses of ordinary life. As a result, a heightened risk awareness does not necessarily motivate personal or collective preparedness. If geoscientists are to help at-risk communities adopt meaningful measures to protect themselves, new strategies are needed for public communication and community engagement. This paper outlines an attempt to develop a novel approach to train geoscientists, using doctoral and post-doctoral researchers in an EU integrated training network studying tectonic processes and geohazards in Turkey. An urban field visit to seismically vulnerable neighbourhoods in Istanbul allowed the researchers to meet with local residents facing the seismic threat. Those meetings exposed the complex social, political and cultural concerns among Istanbul's at-risk urban communities. These concerns were used to provoke subsequent focus group discussions among the group of geoscientists about roles, responsibilities and methods of communicating hazard information to the public. Through the direct testimony of local residents and geoscientists, we explore the form that new strategies for public communication and community engagement might take.

en
dc.format.extent1157 - 1173en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleEarthquake risk communication as dialogue-insights from a workshop in Istanbul's urban renewal neighbourhoodsen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue5en
plymouth.volume16en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/nhess-16-1157-2016en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1684-9981en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.5194/nhess-16-1157-2016en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV