Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, R
dc.contributor.authorKelsey, J
dc.contributor.authorNelmes, P
dc.contributor.authorChinn, N
dc.contributor.authorChinn, T
dc.contributor.authorProctor-Childs, T
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-27T21:15:12Z
dc.date.available2016-04-27T21:15:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-10
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4548
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>To ask: (i) is it feasible to include Twitter as an assessed element of the first‐year nursing curriculum; (ii) how should it be introduced and assessed; and (iii) do students think it worthwhile and learn anything from its use?</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Nursing students need to use social media professionally, avoiding pitfalls but using learning opportunities.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>This case study (2014–2015) comprised: (i) pilot introduction of Digital Professionalism (including Twitter) with second‐ and third‐year students; (ii) introduction and assessment with a first cohort of 450 first‐year students. Based on feedback, methods were revised for; (iii) a second cohort of 97.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Students received a face‐to‐face lecture, two webinars, used chat rooms and were asked to create course Twitter accounts and were assessed on their use.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Few second and third year students started optional Twitter use whereas nearly all first years used it. Most students (70·1% first, 88·0% second cohort) thought inclusion of Twitter was worthwhile. Changes from first to second cohort included better peer–peer support, more contextualization and more emphasis on nursing communities. More second cohort students learned from Twitter (44·4% vs. 70·8%) and used Twitter recently (43·3% vs. 81·6%). Students gained wider perspectives on nursing, better understanding of social media, ‘being student nurses’ and topics like health promotion. Students mostly followed not only online nursing communities but also patient organizations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Including Twitter as an assessed element for first‐year nursing students was feasible, students think it worthwhile and other nursing schools should consider introducing it in the broader context of Digital Professionalism.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extentn/a-n/a
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectcase study
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectsocial media
dc.subjectTwitter
dc.subjectundergraduate curriculum
dc.titleIntroducing Twitter as an assessed component of the undergraduate nursing curriculum: case study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26861572
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume72
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Advanced Nursing
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.12935
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-01-12
dc.rights.embargodate2017-2-10
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jan.12935
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-02-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV