Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorScaife, Jes
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Richard Michael
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-18T10:44:48Z
dc.date.available2016-02-18T10:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10420436en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4341
dc.description.abstract

Dairy production in the UK has undergone a period of sustained increase both in number of cows held in each unit and yields per cow. Whilst much of this yield increase can be attributed to nutritional science, the production capacity of individual animals has also contributed significantly through both higher peak yields and greater persistency of production throughout lactation. This additional production has not come without cost which has manifested itself as a general decrease in reproductive performance. Although the associated lengthening of the calving interval has led to an increase in herd average days in milk, the question arises whether the flatter lactation curves observed in modern animals make the traditional targets of calving at 365 day intervals less relevant. It could be conjectured that, taking into account all of the major cost factors, extension of lactation in modern animals may be economically advantageous. This work created a bio economic model in investigation of the above question using bespoke production modelling based upon current UK production information combined with costs and other income levels relevant to the analysis period. The results were presented as income per cow per day of intercalving interval indicating daily contribution to the herd economics regardless of reproductive performance. The results indicated that the effects of poorer reproductive performance and longer voluntary waiting periods are variable and inversely proportional to increasing yields. For the highest yielding herds early resumption of breeding and conception brings considerable advantage which is driven by the differential between peak and late lactation yields. Increasing average days in milk has a detrimental effect upon production that is greater than the dilution of fixed costs over more days in the calving interval. For the lowest yielding herds the converse was shown with corresponding increases in income per day with increasing lactation length although of very low order. For all production levels analysed replacement rate was the single most important factor affecting income and, as such, indicates why fertility should be the major focus of Holstein breeding. Improved fertility would reduce both calving intervals and involuntary cull levels having a two fold positive effect upon herd economics. The voluntary waiting period was the least significant of the economic factors investigated, the results indicating variable effects by both length of voluntary waiting period and yield level. The economic significance of voluntary waiting period length increases relatively with yield however earlier rebreeding was financially advantageous across almost all yield levels. Although the financial impact of voluntary waiting period length is of low order it is the single factor which is completely in control of the herd management policy. Not withstanding welfare effects, these results would suggest that rebreeding at the earliest opportunity in high yielding animals remains the optimal breeding policy.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Milk Records plcen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlymouth Universityen_US
dc.subjectHolstein
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectFertility
dc.subjectFarming
dc.subjectDairyen_US
dc.titleOptimisation of rebreeding strategy in UK Holstein dairy cattle- a multifactorial studyen_US
dc.typeMastersen_US
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV