Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRihan, HZ
dc.contributor.authorAl-Shamari, M
dc.contributor.authorAl-Swedi, F
dc.contributor.authorBurchett, S
dc.contributor.authorFuller, MP
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T17:23:05Z
dc.date.available2016-02-04T17:23:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.identifier.issn0567-7572
dc.identifier.issn2406-6168
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4265
dc.description.abstract

An effective protocol for the mass production of cauliflower microshoots was refined using the meristematic layer of cauliflower curd. The meristimatic layer was excised, homogenized using a commercial blender and separated into desirable size classes and cultured in liquid culture media containing 2 mg/L kinetin, 1 mg/L IBA (indole butyric acid) and different types and concentrations of sugars. Among several concentrations of sucrose derived from sugar beet, the use of 3% concentration was found to be the optimal. Fructose, glucose and maltose were also tested at 1.5, 3, and 4.5% concentrations and compared with the use of 3% of sucrose which was considered as a standard (control). The best explants response was obtained using maltose but without a significant difference compared with the control. The effect of the source of sucrose on the development of cauliflower culture was also investigated using different concentrations of sucrose derived from both sugar cane and sugar beet. The use of 4.4% sugar cane sucrose was found to be the best in terms of the number of developing microshoots. The results reported in this study help to increase the effectiveness of the cauliflower micropropagation system and to reduce the cost of micropropagule per unit of production.

dc.format.extent87-94
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
dc.subjectsugar
dc.subjectsucrose
dc.subjectsugar cane
dc.subjectmicropropagation
dc.subjectmeristematic tissue
dc.titleTHE EFFECT OF SUGAR TYPE, SOURCE AND CONCENTRATION ON CAULIFLOWER (BRASSICA OLERACEA VAR. BOTRYTIS) MICROSHOOT PRODUCTION
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeProceedings Paper
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000378644300006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1099
plymouth.volume1099
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalActa Horticulturae
dc.identifier.doi10.17660/actahortic.2015.1099.6
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA06 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.rights.embargodate2016-03-01
dc.identifier.eissn2406-6168
dc.rights.embargoperiod6 months
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.17660/actahortic.2015.1099.6
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV