Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRahman, Sen
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-25T10:54:44Z
dc.date.available2015-12-25T10:54:44Z
dc.date.issued2010-06-01en
dc.identifier.issn0021-857Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/4017
dc.description.abstract

This article examines the contribution of women's labour input to productivity and efficiency in crop farming using a large survey dataset of 1,839 households from 16 villages in two agro-ecological regions of Bangladesh. Results reveal that female labour accounts for a substantial 28% of total labour use (mainly supplied from the family) and contributes significantly to productivity as well as technical efficiency. Contrary to expectation, the cost share of female labour input is significantly higher than the male share, and has a substitution relationship with all other inputs, including male labour. The estimated mean level of technical efficiency is 0.90, implying that crop output might be increased by 10% by eliminating technical inefficiency. Both male and female education have a significant impact on improving technical efficiency. Other significant technical efficiency shifters are farming experience, family size and crop diversification. Owner operators are found to be technically inefficient relative to the tenants. Policy implications include creation of a hired labour market for female labour so that more women can be involved in the production process, and can contribute to towards improving productivity and efficiency. In addition, investment in education for both men and women, strategies to promote crop diversification and effective regulation/modification of the tenancy market will significantly improve technical efficiency in this case. © 2010 The Author. Journal compilation © 2010 The Agricultural Economics Society.

en
dc.format.extent318 - 342en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleWomen's labour contribution to productivity and efficiency in agriculture: Empirical evidence from Bangladeshen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue2en
plymouth.volume61en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalJournal of Agricultural Economicsen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00243.xen
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Professional Services staff
dc.identifier.eissn1477-9552en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00243.xen
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV