Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHiscock, J
dc.contributor.authorByrne, P
dc.contributor.authorPeters, S
dc.contributor.authorWestlake, D
dc.contributor.authorGabbay, M
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-21T10:29:11Z
dc.date.available2015-10-21T10:29:11Z
dc.date.issued2009-07
dc.identifier.issn1463-4236
dc.identifier.issn1477-1128
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3669
dc.description.abstract

To explore the factors influencing the completion of the IB113 form for the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), as an exemplar of how general practitioners (GPs) manage and report patient information to external bodies. In UK, GPs complete IB113 forms for their patients approaching longer-term sickness absence, who may be exempt from the incapacity benefit linked medical examination. The DWP has expressed concerns about the quality of such reports, and GP organizations have raised objections to completing such forms. The content of returned forms is variable, and may be subject to a number of influences. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling of GPs and practice managers (PMs). Primary Care practices in the North East of England. GPs and PMs were interviewed using a semi-structured topic guide about completing IB113 forms for the DWP about their patients entering long-term incapacity. The transcribed data were analysed thematically using the framework analysis method. Whilst the IB113 appears superficially straightforward to complete, our results demonstrate levels of overlapping complexity that add ranges of subjectivity and selectivity onto factual reporting, including practice protocols, the gathering and managing of information, the doctor–patient relationship, and doctor’s personal views on systems. The recording and reporting of patient related data by GPs is subject to complex influences, which need to be understood and managed to improve the relevance and quality of reports to third parties. © 2009, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

dc.format.extent254-254
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.subject4203 Health Services and Systems
dc.subject42 Health Sciences
dc.subjectGeneric health relevance
dc.titleComplexity in simple tasks: a qualitative analysis of GPs’ completion of long-term incapacity forms
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue03
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPrimary Health Care Research & Development
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s1463423609001236
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.identifier.eissn1477-1128
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/s1463423609001236
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV