Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorPunt, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCachao, Rita
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Arts, Humanities and Businessen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-03T14:58:35Z
dc.date.available2015-07-03T14:58:35Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10093494en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3411
dc.descriptionFull version unavailable due to 3rd party copyright restrictions.
dc.description.abstract

Current debates on space reveal a dichotomy between two apparently conflicting understandings of space: on the one hand, space is understood as a physical, tangible entity that has an impact on how we perceive, feel and emotionally inhabit the world, and on the other hand, space is conceived as an abstract entity, suggesting that space has no active role (a productivity) within everyday life, being solely a conceptual product of intellectual reasoning. As a result, the commonly used word: ‘space’, will be discussed as an ontologically paradoxical, ambiguous and elusive concept; a concept that cannot be captured within a single definition. This thesis consequently researches the ontology of space by informing a framework that embraces the complexity of space as an ambiguous and unrepresentable entity. It aims to reconcile the multiple understandings of space, liberating it from the binary thinking that opposes the abstract to the physical, disclosing its potential productivity. This thesis thus proposes a methodology departing from a transdisciplinary approach that addresses the variability, multiplicity, paradoxicality and ambiguity of space through a ‘bastard’ epistemology that defies binary logic by considering what falls out of order and norm. To research an ontology through a bastard epistemology is to work outside of (but in combination with) the intelligible and sensible realms, through a framework that is non-representational, but instead enactive and performative, driven by experience, affect and aesthetics; thus allowing access to an entity that is both ambiguous and also unrepresentable. In doing so, this thesis argues that space is diversely implicated in the constitution of research methodologies through its interactions with order and structures, as well as agential in the constitution of understandings of human interactions with the world; and therefore, it will be argued, space has methodological purchase. The consequence of this methodological purchase is that space can reveal itself if a research strategy is implemented that works through the multiple dimensions of space. Within this context the diagram will be introduced as a productive path because enables a bastard epistemology to work through the multiplicity of space, since the diagram, is a performed, materialised outcome of multiple experiences of the making of order through the interaction between physical and conceptual dimensions. In synthesis, the diagram is used to recursively research an ontology of space, showing the main contribution of this thesis: of how without negating its complexity and multiplicity, space can be useful, constructive and productive within contemporary contexts of research methodologies.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFCT, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlymouth Universityen_US
dc.subjectSpaceen_US
dc.subjectKhoraen_US
dc.subjectChoraen_US
dc.subjectDiagramen_US
dc.subjectMethodologyen_US
dc.subjectOntology of Spaceen_US
dc.subjectRecursivenessen_US
dc.subjectMethodological Recursivenessen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Existence of Monstersen_US
dc.subjectTransdisciplinarityen_US
dc.subjectTransdisciplinarity and Artsen_US
dc.titleAn Ontology of Space: Methodological Recursiveness and the Diagramen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionEdited versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/3988


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV