Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorDai, Y Ming
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Kate
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-08T08:52:16Z
dc.date.available2015-04-08T08:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier10268320en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3290
dc.description.abstract

An oscillating water column (OWC) wave energy converter (WEC) is a device designed to extract energy from waves at sea by using the water to move trapped air and thus drive an air turbine. Because the incident waves and the force caused by the power take-off (PTO) interact, control of the power take off (PTO) system can increase the total energy converted. A numerical model was developed to study the interaction of an OWC with the water and other structures around it. ANSYS AQWA is used here to find the effects on the water surface in and around the central column of a five-column, breakwater-mounted OWC. For open OWC structures, coupled modes were seen which lead to sensitivity to incident wave period and direction. The frequency-domain displacements of the internal water surface of the central column were turned into a force-displacement, time-domain model in MATLAB Simulink using a state space approximation. The model of the hydrodynamics was then combined with the thermodynamic and turbine equations for a Wells turbine. A baseline situation was tested for fixed turbine speed operation using a wave climate for a region off the north coast of Devon. A linear feedforward controller and a controller based on maximising turbine efficiency were tested for the system. The linear controller was optimised to find the combination of turbine speed offset and proportional constant that gave maximum energy in the most energy abundant sea state. This increased the converted energy by 31% in comparison to the fixed speed case. For the turbine efficiency control method, the increase was 36%. Energy conversion increases are therefore clearly possible using simple controllers. If increased converted energy is the only criterion for controller choice, then the turbine efficiency control is the best method, however the control action involves using very slow turbine speeds which may not be physically desirable.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlymouth Universityen_US
dc.subjectRenewable Energy
dc.subjectOffshore Renewable Energyen_US
dc.subjectControlen_US
dc.subjectNumerical Modellingen_US
dc.subjectOscillating Water Columnen_US
dc.titleNumerical modelling and control of an oscillating water column wave energy converteren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1382


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV