Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOdalović, M
dc.contributor.authorGorman, A
dc.contributor.authorPaul, A
dc.contributor.authorMcCallion, P
dc.contributor.authorBurke, É
dc.contributor.authorMacLachlan, M
dc.contributor.authorMcCarron, M
dc.contributor.authorHenman, MC
dc.contributor.authorMoran, M
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, J
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, M
dc.contributor.authorShankar, R
dc.contributor.authorRyan, C
dc.contributor.authorO'Dwyer, M
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-03T13:00:40Z
dc.date.available2024-02-03T13:00:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.issn2056-4724
dc.identifier.othere39
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/22015
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec id="S2056472423006075_sec_a1"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The frequent prescribing of psychotropics and high prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults with intellectual disabilities require close monitoring.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006075_sec_a2"> <jats:title>Aims</jats:title> <jats:p>To describe change in prevalence, predictors and health outcomes of psychotropic use during the four waves (2009/2010, 2013/2014, 2016/2017, 2019/2020) of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006075_sec_a3" sec-type="methods"> <jats:title>Method</jats:title> <jats:p>Eligible participants were adults (≥40 years) with intellectual disabilities who participated in all four waves of IDS-TILDA and who reported medication use for the entire period. Differences between groups were tested using Cochran's <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic> test for binary variables and the McNemar–Bowker test for variables with more than two categories. Generalised estimating equation models were used to assess associations between psychotropic use, participants’ characteristics and health outcomes.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006075_sec_a4" sec-type="results"> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Across waves (433 participants) there were no significant differences in prevalence of psychotropic use (61.2–64.2%) and psychotropic polypharmacy (42.7–38.3%). Antipsychotics were the most used subgroup, without significant change in prevalence between waves (47.6–44.6%). A significant decrease was observed for anxiolytics (26.8–17.6%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and hypnotics/sedatives (14.1–9.0%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). A significant increase was recorded for antidepressants (28.6–35.8%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001) and mood-stabilising agents (11.5–14.6%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). Psychotropic polypharmacy (≥2 psychotropics) was significantly associated with moderate to total dependence in performing activities of daily living over the 10-year period (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.21–2.69; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="S2056472423006075_sec_a5" sec-type="conclusions"> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>The study indicates an increase in usage of some classes of psychotropic, a reduction in others and no change in the relatively high rate of antipsychotic use over 10 years in a cohort of older adults with intellectual disabilities and consequent risk of psychotropic polypharmacy and medication-related harm.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extente39-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatrists
dc.subjectIntellectual disability
dc.subjectpolypharmacy
dc.subjectantipsychotics
dc.subjectantidepressants
dc.subjectpsychotropic medicines
dc.titlePsychotropic medicines’ prevalence, patterns and effects on cognitive and physical function in older adults with intellectual disability in Ireland: longitudinal cohort study, 2009–2020
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38297892
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalBJPsych Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjo.2023.607
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.date.updated2024-02-03T13:00:40Z
dc.identifier.eissn2056-4724
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1192/bjo.2023.607


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV