Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEid, MH
dc.contributor.authorŢânţu, M
dc.contributor.authorLatour, JM
dc.contributor.authorSultan, MA
dc.contributor.authorKandeel, NA
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T14:26:36Z
dc.date.available2024-01-10T14:26:36Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-04
dc.identifier.issn2296-858X
dc.identifier.issn2296-858X
dc.identifier.otherARTN 1295277
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21891
dc.description.abstract

Background: Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients differs across the world. In many low and middle-income countries, endotracheal suctioning is often performed with a sterile suctioning catheter that is used for 12 h or during the length of one nursing shift. The effect of flushing multiple used endotracheal suction system with chlorhexidine after suctioning to reduce ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) remains unclear. Aim: The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness of flushing multiple-used open endotracheal suction catheters and suctioning system with chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% to reduce VAP in mechanically ventilated patients in a resource-limited Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Due to the difficulty of blinding the intervention for nurses who perform endo-tracheal suction procedures, we adopted a quasi-experimental method with a randomized controlled trial design. A sample of 136 ICU patients were allocated to the intervention (n = 68) or control group (n = 68) between May and November 2020. The intervention was flushing the multiple-used suction catheter and suction system with 40ml chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% and in the control group we used normal saline to flush the catheter and suction system. The primary outcome was incidence of VAP and the cost of the flushing solutions was the secondary outcome measure. Results: Patients in the intervention group had a lower incidence of VAP compared to patients in the control group; 15 (22.1%) vs 29 (42.6%), p = 0.01. The incidence of late-onset VAP was 26.2% in the intervention group and 49% in the control group (p = 0.026) and the early-onset VAP was 13.2% in the intervention group and 25% in the control group (p = 0.081). Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% reduced the cost of suction system flushing (median: 78.4 vs 300 EGP, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Using chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% to flush multiple-used suctioning catheters after every endo-tracheal suction procedure might reduce the incidence of VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% can be a cost-effective solution for flushing the suction circuit. Nurses working in resource-limited ICUs and using suctioning catheters multiple times might consider using chlorhexidine gluconate 0.2% instead of normal saline or distilled water when flushing the suction system. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05206721.

dc.format.extent1295277-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.subjectairway management
dc.subjectchlorhexidine
dc.subjectendotracheal suctioning
dc.subjectintensive care units
dc.subjectventilator-associated pneumonia
dc.subjectglobal health
dc.subjectgreen ICU
dc.titleSuction circuit flushing with chlorhexidine decreases ventilator-associated pneumonia: a quasi-experimental study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38111699
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295277
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalFrontiers in Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fmed.2023.1295277
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2028 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-06
dc.date.updated2024-01-10T14:26:35Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-1-12
dc.identifier.eissn2296-858X
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3389/fmed.2023.1295277


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV