Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWedlake, L
dc.contributor.authorMellor, D
dc.contributor.authorMarriott, T
dc.contributor.authorMaslin, K
dc.contributor.authorFrost, G
dc.contributor.authorHickson, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T12:01:49Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T12:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-15
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21599
dc.description.abstract

Background The Manual of dietetic practice (‘Manual’) is the core textbook for qualified and student dietitians. A survey was conducted to explore views on the scope, content and presentation of the Manual to inform the forthcoming edition.

Methods The survey comprised of questions on demographics, structure, content, access (print/digital), missing topics, strengths and weaknesses. It was distributed to members of the British Dietetic Association (BDA) and other relevant groups in August 2022. Responses are presented as frequencies and free text as themes.

Results Of 1179 responses, 91% were from professionals, of whom 72% were registered dietitians with a mean of 12.7 years (range: 1–44) in practice: 60% worked in the United Kingdom with 52% based in a clinical setting. The printed version was preferred: 59% professionals, 60% students, 94% professionals and 88% students were satisfied with the structure; however, 26% professionals and 22% students identified content that was lacking or outdated, including mental health and sustainability. The strengths were its comprehensive coverage and respected contributing authors. Weaknesses included the cost, size, lack of visual aids and currency. Professionals indicated the seventh edition should focus on more practical information required for clinical practice, whereas students wanted more emphasis on summarised information and visual formats.

Conclusions The survey proved a valuable method to engage with the readership to ensure the next edition reflected their requirements. Although nearly all respondents were satisfied with the scope and content, the results highlighted those topics lacking and/or outdated. Results also showed that the next edition should focus on practical information required for clinical practice, with more summarised and visual formats.

dc.format.extent280-291
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectManual of dietetic practice
dc.subjectonline survey
dc.subjectprofessional practice
dc.subjecttextbook
dc.titleWhat do readers want? Results of an online survey to involve readers in updating the seventh edition of the Manual of dietetic practice
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
dc.typeEarly Access
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37840226
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume37
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.13254
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-29
dc.date.updated2023-11-07T12:01:49Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-11-9
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.13254


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV