Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoldsworthy, S
dc.contributor.authorLatour, J
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, S
dc.contributor.authorMcNair, H
dc.contributor.authorCramp, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-02T14:59:50Z
dc.date.available2023-08-02T14:59:50Z
dc.date.issued2023-08
dc.identifier.issn1532-2831
dc.identifier.issn1532-2831
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21134
dc.description.abstract

Introduction A comfortable treatment position in radiotherapy may promote patient stability and improve outcomes such as accuracy. The aim of this study was to identify, prioritise and determine the feasibility of delivery of intervention components as part of a radiotherapy comfort intervention package. Methods Prior research, consisting of a systematic review and qualitative interviews with patient and therapeutic radiographers, was triangulated and 15 intervention components developed. An online nominal group technique consensus meeting with 7 patients who received radiotherapy exceeding 10 min for one of three anatomical cancer sites and 3 therapeutic radiographers (TRs) participated. Four activities were undertaken: 1) discussion of comfort intervention components; 2) initial vote; 3) prioritisation of intervention components; and 4) discussion of feasibility in radiotherapy and were analysed using established quantitative and qualitative methods. Results One intervention component was added from initial discussions to the 15 pre-determined components being discussed. 11 components were recommended as ‘accepted’ (n = 5) or ‘accepted with caution’ (n = 6) to proceed to development. The highest scoring intervention components were ‘Compassionate & empathetic communication training for TRs’ and ‘Tailored information, e.g., TRs provide the required information only as part of preparation for treatment’. Anther that followed closely was ‘Adjustments & supports provided for arms or legs during treatment by TRs’. Those ‘accepted with caution’ included ‘Soft pads/mattress under the body to alleviate body discomfort managed by TRs’. Qualitative analysis highlighted concerns over the radiation environment and emphasised the importance of resources such as equipment, training, and time. Conclusion The recommended comfort interventions have potential to improve patient comfort during radiotherapy and should be considered to incorporate into positioning and immobilisation guidelines. However, specific intervention strategies to address these components will need to be developed and robustly evaluated. Implications for practice Comfort interventions might help patients relax and stay still during treatment, which could improve treatment accuracy and efficacy. Introducing these comfort interventions in practice have potential to lead to a more positive patient experience and improved overall quality of care during radiotherapy.

dc.format.extent926-934
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectComfort solutions
dc.subjectNGT
dc.subjectInterventions
dc.subjectConsensus
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.titleIdentifying core components of a radiotherapy comfort intervention package using nominal group technique Radiography
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37499585
plymouth.issue5
plymouth.volume29
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalRadiography
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2023.07.006
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health|School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-07-11
dc.date.updated2023-08-02T14:59:49Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-7-27
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2831
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.radi.2023.07.006


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV