Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSun, JJ
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, L
dc.contributor.authorHenley, W
dc.contributor.authorLaugharne, R
dc.contributor.authorAngus-Leppan, H
dc.contributor.authorSawhney, I
dc.contributor.authorShahidi, MM
dc.contributor.authorPurandare, K
dc.contributor.authorEyeoyibo, M
dc.contributor.authorScheepers, M
dc.contributor.authorLines, G
dc.contributor.authorWinterhalder, R
dc.contributor.authorPerera, B
dc.contributor.authorHyams, B
dc.contributor.authorAshby, S
dc.contributor.authorShankar, Rohit
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T13:20:00Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T13:20:00Z
dc.date.issued2023-07
dc.identifier.issn1432-1459
dc.identifier.issn1432-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21096
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: People with epilepsy (PWE) and people with intellectual disabilities (ID) both live shorter lives than the general population and both conditions increase the risk of death further. We aimed to measure associations between certain risk factors for death in PWE and ID. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in ten regions in England and Wales. Data were collected on PWE registered with secondary care ID and neurology services between 2017 and 2021. Prevalence rates of neurodevelopmental, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, seizure frequency, psychotropic and antiseizure medications (ASM) prescribed, and health activity (epilepsy reviews/risk assessments/care plans/compliance etc.) recorded were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 190 PWE and ID who died were compared with 910 living controls. People who died were less likely to have had an epilepsy risk assessment but had a greater prevalence of genetic conditions, older age, poor physical health, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, polypharmacy (not ASMs) and antipsychotic use. The multivariable logistic regression for risk of epilepsy-related death identified that age over 50, medical condition prevalence, antipsychotic medication use and the lack of an epilepsy review in the last 12 months as associated with increased risk of death. Reviews by psychiatrists in ID services was associated with a 72% reduction in the odds of death compared neurology services. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and use of antipsychotics may be associated with death but not ASMs. Greater and closer monitoring by creating capable health communities may reduce the risk of death. ID services maybe more likely to provide this holistic approach.

dc.format.extent3527-3536
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectDevelopmental disabilites
dc.subjectPremature mortality
dc.subjectSeizures
dc.subjectMulti-morbidity
dc.subjectAntipsychotics prescribing
dc.subjectNeurodevelopment
dc.titleMortality risk in adults with intellectual disabilities and epilepsy: an England and Wales case–control study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000989536600004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume270
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Neurology
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00415-023-11701-6
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
dc.publisher.placeGermany
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-30
dc.date.updated2023-07-31T13:19:59Z
dc.rights.embargodate2024-4-5
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1459
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00415-023-11701-6


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV