Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorShepherd, Derek
dc.contributor.authorFinn, Kristin
dc.contributor.otherPlymouth Business Schoolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T09:16:19Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier751928en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/21088
dc.description.abstract

The UK live events market has long been considered to be a growth sector. Given the range of challenges linked to event crowd safety felt by the industry in recent years, and despite recent setbacks associated with new safety measures and public uncertainty following the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, event organisers remain optimistic about the future. Many authors have studied crowd dynamics and safety planning in recent years, but often the emphasis has been one of objective observation and expert opinion. The outcomes of this thesis are timely as it aimed to investigate attitudinal differences among event audiences relating to safety, and the nature of crowd incidents, alongside observed and perceived efficacy of crowd management strategies, with the ultimate intention to better understand the audiences that attend events and provide recommendations for tailored crowd management strategies and successful, safe event delivery for the long term.

A two-phase methodology was employed using mixed methods and underpinned by a pragmatic philosophical approach. Phase one involved the development of a global crowd incident database with data collated on a range of key factors for analysis that addressed the interrelated complexities of delivering safe and successful events. Phase two then explored audience perceptions related to the efficacy of crowd management strategies and perceived event safety, from 512 UK event attendees in total, across a wide range of events. Practically, the data generated from this joined up approach provide a robust overview of crowd dynamics and its relationship to strategic event safety management to aid in the activity of profiling crowds in attendance at events, alongside the likely dynamic intervening variables of influence that must be determined in order to develop targeted and effective crowd management strategies.

The new knowledge developed from the thesis research outcomes represents an original interdisciplinary contribution to the existing body of literature concerned with crowd dynamics and managing event safety, and also provides a practical contribution to the field of crowd safety management in several ways. First, the matrix of crowd dynamics and effective safety strategies provides detailed insights in relation to likely crowd profiles attending different events as well as unique recommendations for their safe and effective management. Second, a new theoretical representation of crowd dynamics and strategic event safety management was developed that reviews the strategic crowd management process in its entirety to provide an overview of the process, its influences and potential strategic fail points that can impact on an event’s safety outcome and its ultimate success or failure. Its application could arguably aid practitioner understanding, to instil a strategic ‘overview’ of the fundamental elements involved in the crowd safety strategic process when safety is not their primary role. This enhanced understanding would arguably be beneficial to the event safety management process as a whole.

en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.subjectCrowd dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectCrowd managementen_US
dc.subjectEvent managementen_US
dc.subjectCrowd behaviouren_US
dc.subjectSite planningen_US
dc.subjectSite designen_US
dc.subjectEvent safety strategiesen_US
dc.subjectRisk management and resilienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhDen_US
dc.titleAN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CROWD DYNAMICS AND MANAGING SAFETY AT EVENTSen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionpublishableen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/5077
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/5077
dc.rights.embargodate2024-07-31T09:16:19Z
dc.rights.embargoperiod12 monthsen_US
dc.type.qualificationDoctorateen_US
rioxxterms.versionNA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV