Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJha, Awadhesh
dc.contributor.authorKumaravel, TS
dc.contributor.authorBrabu, B
dc.contributor.authorParthiban, N
dc.contributor.authorMurugan, SS
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T12:24:07Z
dc.date.available2023-06-20T12:24:07Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.identifier.issn1879-3169
dc.identifier.urihttps://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/handle/10026.1/20989
dc.description.abstract

Toxicological risk assessment of medical devices requires genotoxicity assessment as per ISO 10993, Part 3, which is designed to address gene mutations, clastogenicity and/or aneugenicity endpoints. ‘Site of contact genotoxicity’ is a potential genotoxic risk especially for medical implants, that is currently not addressed in biocompatibility standards. We therefore performed initial validation study on the use of alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) for detecting ‘site of contact genotoxicity’ of medical devices, using test items made of acrylic implants impregnated with ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS). Comet assay detected increased DNA migration at the site of implantation, but not in the liver. The same implants also failed to show any genotoxicity potentials, when tested on the standard test battery using Salmonella/microsome and chromosome aberration assays. The study suggested that some medical implants can cause ‘site of contact genotoxicity’, without producing systemic genotoxicity. In conclusion, comet assay will add new dimension to safety assessment of medical devices, and this assay can be added to the battery of genetic toxicology tests for evaluating biocompatibility of medical implants.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.title‘Site of contact genotoxicity’ assessment for implants - Potential use of single cell gel electrophoresis in biocompatibility testing of medical devices
dc.typejournal-article
plymouth.journalToxicology Letters
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.01.024
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Faculty of Science and Engineering|School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Research Groups|Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Academics
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|REF 2021 Researchers by UoA|UoA06 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food Science
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Admin Group - REF|REF Admin Group - FoSE
plymouth.organisational-group|Plymouth|Users by role|Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-30
dc.date.updated2023-06-20T12:24:07Z
dc.rights.embargodate2023-6-21
dc.rights.embargoperiodforever
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.01.024


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV