Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrace, B
dc.contributor.authorSHAWE, JILL
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, G
dc.contributor.authorUsman, NO
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, J
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T13:12:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-28
dc.identifier.issn1742-4755
dc.identifier.issn1742-4755
dc.identifier.other203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/20472
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The importance of improving men’s and women’s knowledge of sexual and reproductive health has been emphasised in numerous global health policies. Fertility awareness literature highlights a disproportionately higher number of articles related to pregnancy-prevention compared to pregnancy-planning, which is justifiable in many contexts. However, recent concerted effort to improve fertility-awareness warrants a closer investigation of basic reproductive health terminologies. The objective of this study is to explore participants’ views of “family building” and provide a definition.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We conducted 35 qualitative in-depth interviews on men, women and healthcare professionals who were sampled from a UK cross-sectional survey. We asked participants about terms such as ‘family planning’ and ‘family building’ to elicit views and explored the appropriateness of the term “family building.” Data were transcribed and analysed via Framework analysis. </jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>When asked what ‘family planning’ meant to them, study participants stated that the term meant the avoidance of pregnancy. They viewed it as an “<jats:italic>umbrella term for the use of contraception methods,</jats:italic>” that “<jats:italic>paradoxically, the term family planning almost has a negative connotation regarding having a family</jats:italic>,” but could not state similar terminology for planning a family. Reasons cited for this perspective include the focus of school education and usage in clinical settings.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>In the absence of an explicit definition in literature, we generated a new definition for family building as follows: “<jats:italic>Family building refers to the construction or formation of a family, which can include steps or actions taken by an individual towards having children. In contrast to family planning, the intent focuses on pregnancy planning and childbearing rather than pregnancy prevention. However, it can also include actions taken to space the number of children one has.</jats:italic>” Some balance in the global public health messages, including bridging the gap in reproductive health literature, policies, processes and practices may contribute to the effort to improve fertility knowledge. Use of appropriate terminologies help optimise reproductive health services in order to enable men and women achieve their desired fertility intentions, whatever they may be.</jats:p> <jats:p><jats:italic>Trial registration</jats:italic> Not applicable</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent203-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectFamily planning
dc.subjectFamily building
dc.subjectFertility awareness
dc.subjectPsychosocial
dc.subjectReproductive Health
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectChildbearing
dc.subjectPreconception health
dc.subjectReproductive intentions
dc.subjectFertility education
dc.titleWhat does family building mean? A qualitative exploration and a new definition: a UK-based study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000876307100001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume19
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalReproductive Health
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12978-022-01511-w
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-10-08
dc.rights.embargodate2023-2-21
dc.identifier.eissn1742-4755
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12978-022-01511-w
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-10-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV