Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTack, L
dc.contributor.authorMaenhoudt, A-S
dc.contributor.authorKetelaars, L
dc.contributor.authorDe Zutter, J
dc.contributor.authorPinson, S
dc.contributor.authorKeunebrock, L
dc.contributor.authorHaaker, L
dc.contributor.authorDeckmyn, K
dc.contributor.authorGheysen, M
dc.contributor.authorKenis, C
dc.contributor.authorWildiers, H
dc.contributor.authorDepoorter, L
dc.contributor.authorGeerts, P-J
dc.contributor.authorChandler, R
dc.contributor.authorBoterberg, T
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, P
dc.contributor.authorParris, CN
dc.contributor.authorDebruyne, PR
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T10:49:18Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T10:49:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-02
dc.identifier.issn1198-0052
dc.identifier.issn1718-7729
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/20273
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>Depression is a common and disabling disorder in later life, particularly among people with poor physical health. There are many screening tools available that can be used to examine depressive symptoms; however, not all of them may be appropriate or accurate for older adults with cancer. This pilot study was designed to test the diagnostic performance of two screening tools and their short versions in a cohort of vulnerable (G8 score ≤ 14/17) older patients with cancer undergoing comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). The prospective analysis covered 50 vulnerable patients with cancer aged ≥70 years. The diagnostic performance of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-15, GDS-4, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and PHQ-2 was compared to the ‘gold standard’ Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders (SCID-5-S) depression module A. The sensitivity and specificity in detecting depressive symptoms were the highest in the case of PHQ-2, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 92.7%. The AUROC for the 9-item version, PHQ-9, was 90.2%. For the GDS-15 and GDS-4, the AUROC was only 56.2% and 62.0%, respectively. The SCREEN pilot study illustrates the potential benefit of using a shorter screening tool, PHQ-2, to identify older patients with cancer who would benefit from a more in-depth emotional evaluation as part of a CGA.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent1805-1817
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectoncogeriatric
dc.subjectolder adults with cancer
dc.subjectPatient Health Questionnaire
dc.subjectGeriatric Depression Scale
dc.titleDiagnostic Performance of Screening Tools for Depressive Symptoms in Vulnerable Older Patients with Cancer Undergoing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA): Results from the SCREEN Pilot Study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36826101
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume30
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalCurrent Oncology
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/curroncol30020140
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-01-30
dc.rights.embargodate2023-2-14
dc.identifier.eissn1718-7729
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/curroncol30020140
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV