Objective and subjective safety in unmanned shipping.
| dc.contributor.author | Stones, H | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-13T14:19:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-10-13T14:19:13Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-11-18 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1471-9614 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19682 | |
| dc.description | **This is a metadata-only record** The file(s) associated with this record are no longer available. We apologise for the inconvenience. Record updated on 19/12/2022 by KT (LDS). | |
| dc.description.abstract |
Unmanned ships must be as safe as possible to ensure that they are adopted and operate successfully. To objectively consider unmanned ships safe, appropriate laws must apply, and, in order to ensure that they do, definitions of autonomy have to be agreed upon between lawyers and engineers. An example of ensuring subjective safety is to ensure that collision avoidance systems fully incorporate Collision Regulations. | |
| dc.format.extent | 4-6 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | Objective and subjective safety in unmanned shipping. | |
| dc.type | journal-article | |
| dc.type | JOUR | |
| plymouth.issue | 9 | |
| plymouth.volume | 16 | |
| plymouth.journal | Lloyd's Shipping and Trade Law | |
| plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
| plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business | |
| plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
| dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
| rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
| rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |