Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNiner, HJ
dc.contributor.authorJones, PJS
dc.contributor.authorMilligan, B
dc.contributor.authorStyan, C
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-04T08:22:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.identifier.issn1095-8630
dc.identifier.other113062
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19173
dc.description.abstract

Biodiversity offsetting with associated aims of no net loss of biodiversity (NNL) is an approach used to align economic development with conservation. Biodiversity offsetting may be more challenging in marine environments, with recent evidence suggesting that the current application of the approach in Australian marine environments rarely follows 'best practice' and is unlikely to be meeting stated policy aims. To understand how and why this deviation from best practice is taking place in marine systems, we analysed current practice in Australia through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 31 participants with professional experience in the development and implementation of associated policy. Thematic analysis of results indicated that, despite commitment to best practice in principle, practitioners recognised that operationalisation of marine biodiversity offsetting was inconsistent and unlikely to be meeting stated goals such as NNL. Participants described the central barrier to the adoption of best practice as the technical complexity of assessing and quantifying biodiversity losses and gains, and uncertainty in restoration in marine contexts. With offsetting described as an integral part of development consent for marine economic development, both these barriers and their navigation presents threats to users setting off a chain of accepted activity leading away from best practice. These threats were perceived to arise from low governmental capacity or prioritisation for environmental management, institutional needs for a social licence to operate, and overarching demands for economic growth. We conclude that marine biodiversity offsetting has come to be ambiguous in its practical definition, with a range of conflicting factors influencing its use and preventing the standardisation required to meet rigorous interpretations of best practice necessary to ensure biodiversity protection and NNL.

dc.format.extent113062-113062
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectMarine offsets
dc.subjectNo net loss
dc.subjectMitigation hierarchy
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact assessment
dc.subjectSocial licence to operate
dc.titleExploring the practical implementation of marine biodiversity offsetting in Australia
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34157544
plymouth.volume295
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113062
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Environmental Management
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113062
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-08
dc.rights.embargodate2022-6-20
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8630
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113062
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-10-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV