Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalik, MS
dc.contributor.authorAkoh, J
dc.contributor.authorAroori, S
dc.contributor.authorLatour, JM
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-03T12:26:48Z
dc.date.available2022-05-03T12:26:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-04
dc.identifier.issn1304-0855
dc.identifier.issn2146-8427
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/19147
dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVES: Vascular complications account for 30% to 35% of total kidney grafts lost during the first 3 months posttransplant. Early detection of vascular complications allows an opportunity for prompt intervention, which is critical to reducing graft loss. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of an implantable Doppler probe as a vascular monitoring device in kidney transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An implantable Doppler probe is used intermittently for postoperative monitoring of kidney transplant patients at our center. In this retrospective study, we analyzed prospectively maintained medical data in which we compared clinical outcomes of kidney transplant recipients who had postoperative implantable Doppler probe monitoring versus standard care clinical observation. Between January 2016 and October 2021, 324 kidney transplant patients were seen at our center. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 194; 60%) included kidney transplant recipients with postoperative implantable Doppler probe monitoring and group 2 (n = 129; 40%) included kidney transplant recipients with standard care clinical observation. We compared number of vascular complications, number of departmental ultrasonographic scans required posttransplant, and graftloss at 3 months between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Vascular complications were identified in 13.5% of total patients, with graft loss identified in 2.1%. Both groups were similar in demographical characteristics. Group 1 had more vascular complications (17.5% vs 9.3%; relative risk = 1.88), fewer ultrasonographic scans during the first 24 hours posttransplant (71.1% vs 83.7%; relative risk = 0.84), and lower graft loss (1.5% vs 3.1%; relative risk = 0.48) than group 2. All probes were removed safely after 72 hours, and no complications related to the device were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring device may be used as an additional adjunct for graft monitoring in kidney transplant patients. Further controlled studies are warranted to evaluate this device in clinical practice.

dc.format.extent355-361
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBaskent University
dc.subjectBlood flow
dc.subjectGraft perfusion surveillance
dc.subjectRenal transplantation
dc.titleImplantable Doppler Probe as a Vascular Monitoring Device in Kidney Transplant Patients: Investigation of Use at a Single Center
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475419
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume20
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalExperimental and Clinical Transplantation
dc.identifier.doi10.6002/ect.2021.0500
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeTurkey
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-01
dc.rights.embargodate2022-7-9
dc.identifier.eissn2146-8427
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.6002/ect.2021.0500
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV