Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRees, Sian
dc.contributor.authorAshley, M
dc.contributor.authorCameron, A
dc.contributor.authorMullier, T
dc.contributor.authorIngle, C
dc.contributor.authorOates, J
dc.contributor.authorLannin, A
dc.contributor.authorHooper, T
dc.contributor.authorAttrill, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T14:24:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T14:24:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-08
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901
dc.identifier.issn1365-2664
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18941
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Documented biodiversity loss has galvanised a global process to develop conceptual frameworks that link the social and ecological systems. This paper focusses on the development of the first marine natural capital asset and risk register as a foundational decision support tool to understand the risk to ecosystem service delivery in relation to policy or management interventions.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We make use of existing marine data products to define the component parts of the asset status (extent, condition, spatial configuration) in line with a natural capital approach. We ‘Pioneer’ the application of this approach in North Devon, UK, an area defined by UK Government to test how marine natural capital can be effectively managed to deliver benefits to the environment, economy and people, and identify how best to share and scale up this learning.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>We demonstrate that the majority of asset–benefit relationships are at a medium to high risk of loss under current use and management.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Despite policy and management measures to reduce pressures on marine systems, activities linked to fishing, farming and the water industry continue to pose a medium to high risk to the asset–benefit relationships. A lack of accurate spatial fishing effort data greatly reduces opportunities for rational and targeted approaches to improve the condition status of marine natural capital assets. Marine protected areas as a single tool are insufficient to prevent further loss of biodiversity that underpins all asset–benefit relationships.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p><jats:italic>Synthesis and applications</jats:italic>. Through development of the first marine natural capital asset and risk register we demonstrates a novel decision support tool to understand the risk to ecosystem service availability in relation to environmental policy or management interventions. The results highlight that current marine governance strategies to protect biodiversity are not sufficient to reduce the risk of loss of ecosystem services. Wider application of the marine natural capital approach will require increasing confidence in the metrics to define marine asset status; more directed monitoring (extent and condition) and; greater accuracy in spatial fishing effort.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p>

dc.format.extent1098-1109
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18563
dc.subjectecosystem accounts
dc.subjectecosystem services
dc.subjectmarine protected areas
dc.subjectmarine spatial planning
dc.subjectnatural capital
dc.subjectrisk
dc.titleA marine natural capital asset and risk register—Towards securing the benefits from marine systems and linked ecosystem services
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000762576000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume59
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Applied Ecology
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2664.14121
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PRIMaRE Publications
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA14 Geography and Environmental Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-06
dc.rights.embargodate2022-3-12
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2664
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.funderNatural Environment Research Council
rioxxterms.identifier.projectSouth West Partnership for Environment and Economic Prosperity (SWEEP)
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/1365-2664.14121
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderSouth West Partnership for Environment and Economic Prosperity (SWEEP)::Natural Environment Research Council


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV