Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavey, T
dc.contributor.authorSarmiento, J
dc.contributor.authorOhana, J
dc.contributor.authorThiebaut, F
dc.contributor.authorHaquin, S
dc.contributor.authorWeber, M
dc.contributor.authorGueydon, S
dc.contributor.authorJudge, F
dc.contributor.authorLyden, E
dc.contributor.authorO’Shea, M
dc.contributor.authorGabl, R
dc.contributor.authorJordan, L-B
dc.contributor.authorHann, Martyn
dc.contributor.authorWang, D
dc.contributor.authorCollins, KM
dc.contributor.authorConley, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGreaves, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorIngram, DM
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-15T12:11:20Z
dc.date.available2021-10-15T12:11:20Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-30
dc.identifier.issn2077-1312
dc.identifier.issn2077-1312
dc.identifier.otherARTN 946
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18073
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>The EU H2020 MaRINET2 project has a goal to improve the quality, robustness and accuracy of physical modelling and associated testing practices for the offshore renewable energy sector. To support this aim, a round robin scale physical modelling test programme was conducted to deploy a common wave energy converter at four wave basins operated by MaRINET2 partners. Test campaigns were conducted at each facility to a common specification and test matrix, providing the unique opportunity for intercomparison between facilities and working practices. A nonproprietary hinged raft, with a nominal scale of 1:25, was tested under a set of 12 irregular sea states. This allowed for an assessment of power output, hinge angles, mooring loads, and six-degree-of-freedom motions. The key outcome to be concluded from the results is that the facilities performed consistently, with the majority of variation linked to differences in sea state calibration. A variation of 5–10% in mean power was typical and was consistent with the variability observed in the measured significant wave heights. The tank depth (which varied from 2–5 m) showed remarkably little influence on the results, although it is noted that these tests used an aerial mooring system with the geometry unaffected by the tank depth. Similar good agreement was seen in the heave, surge, pitch and hinge angle responses. In order to maintain and improve the consistency across laboratories, we make recommendations on characterising and calibrating the tank environment and stress the importance of the device–facility physical interface (the aerial mooring in this case).</jats:p>

dc.format.extent946-946
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.subjectwave energy converter
dc.subjecttank testing
dc.subjectcomparison
dc.subjectirregular waves
dc.titleRound Robin Testing: Exploring Experimental Uncertainties through a Multifacility Comparison of a Hinged Raft Wave Energy Converter
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000699489500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue9
plymouth.volume9
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalJournal of Marine Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jmse9090946
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/PRIMaRE Publications
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA12 Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Marine Institute
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-25
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-16
dc.identifier.eissn2077-1312
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/jmse9090946
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
plymouth.funderMarine Renewables Infrastructure Network for Emerging Energy Technologies 2 (MaRINET 2)::EU H2020-INFRAIA-2016-1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV