Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyndon, H
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorKent, B
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-09T09:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-08
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/18028
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>To identify and establish expert consensus on important and feasible components of a nurse‐led, comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)‐based intervention for community‐dwelling older people who live with frailty.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>A three‐round modified e‐Delphi survey.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>An expert panel of 33 UK specialist older people's, primary and community care nurses participated in the three‐round e‐Delphi survey over a 12‐month period in 2017–2018. Data from round 1 were analysed using content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used in the subsequent two rounds to demonstrate convergence of panel opinion and consensus.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In round 1, experts proposed 30 CGA components that were combined with six additional components from a literature review and clustered into six domains. In round 2, components were rated for importance and feasibility. Rating scores for importance were high across all domains, with lower scores for feasibility. Round 3 revealed that 36 components achieved consensus on importance and 11 out of 36 components reached consensus on feasibility.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Based on expert panel opinion, the content of a nurse‐led CGA‐based intervention was established, with the aim of future feasibility testing in a randomized controlled trial.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Impact</jats:title><jats:p>This study provides feasible components of a CGA‐based intervention that can be implemented in clinical practice by nurses in partnership with older people who live with frailty. Following further testing and evaluation, the components have the potential to improve clinical outcomes, maximize independence and improve the quality of life for community‐dwelling frail older people.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent1031-1043
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectcarers
dc.subjectcommunity care
dc.subjectcomprehensive geriatric assessment
dc.subjectfrailty
dc.subjectnurse-led
dc.subjectnurses
dc.subjectnursing
dc.subjectolder people
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.titleDesigning a nurse-led assessment and care planning intervention to support frail older people in primary care: An e-Delphi study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000705043600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume78
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Advanced Nursing
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.15066
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Applied Parkinson's Research
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-23
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-12
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2648
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jan.15066
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-10-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV