Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDu, X
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Z
dc.contributor.authorDong, L
dc.contributor.authorLiu, J
dc.contributor.authorBorthwick, Alistair
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Renzhi
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-22T17:01:33Z
dc.date.available2021-08-22T17:01:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-20
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17710
dc.description.abstract

Abrupt environmental pollution accidents cause considerable damage worldwide to the ecological environment, human health, and property. The concept of acceptable risk aims to answer whether or not a given environmental pollution risk exceeds a societally determined criterion. This paper presents a case study on acceptable environmental pollution risk conducted through a questionnaire survey carried out between August and October 2014 in five representative districts and two counties of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, China. Here, environmental risk primarily arises from accidental water pollution, accidental air pollution, and tailings dam failure. Based on 870 valid questionnaires, demographic and regional differences in public attitudes towards abrupt environmental pollution risks were analyzed, and risk acceptance impact factors determined. The results showed females, people between 21-40 years of age, people with higher levels of education, public servants, and people with higher income had lower risk tolerance. People with lower perceived risk, low-level risk knowledge, high-level familiarity and satisfaction with environmental management, and without experience of environmental accidents had higher risk tolerance. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that public satisfaction with environmental management was the most significant factor in risk acceptance, followed by perceived risk of abrupt air pollution, occupation, perceived risk of tailings dam failure, and sex. These findings should be helpful to local decision-makers concerned with environmental risk management (e.g., selecting target groups for effective risk communication) in the context of abrupt environmental accidents.

dc.format.extent443-443
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.subjectenvironmental risk
dc.subjectpsychometric paradigm
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectrisk acceptance
dc.subjectrisk perception
dc.subjecttailings ponds
dc.subjectAccidents
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectCities
dc.subjectDisasters
dc.subjectEnvironmental Pollution
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLogistic Models
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPerception
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectSocioeconomic Factors
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleAcceptable Risk Analysis for Abrupt Environmental Pollution Accidents in Zhangjiakou City, China
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425956
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume14
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijerph14040443
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-04-17
dc.identifier.eissn1660-4601
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/ijerph14040443
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-04-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV