Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSugarman, M
dc.contributor.authorGraham, B
dc.contributor.authorLangston, S
dc.contributor.authorNelmes, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, J
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-11T17:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.identifier.issn1472-0205
dc.identifier.issn1472-0213
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17561
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>Hot debriefing (HoD) describes a structured team-based discussion which may be initiated following a significant event. Benefits may include improved teamwork, staff well-being and identification of learning opportunities. Existing literature indicates that while staff value HoD following significant events, it is infrequently undertaken in practice. Internationally, several frameworks for HoD have been developed, although none are widely adopted for use in the ED. A quality improvement project was conducted to introduce HoD into a single UK ED in North West England, between January and March 2019. Following stakeholder consultation, the 9-item ‘TAKE STOCK’ tool was developed. Implementation of the tool increased the number of HoD (0—2.2 HoD episodes/week). Findings from the first plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycle are presented, which revealed the key strengths and limitations of this model. Staff perceptions of the tool were evaluated using a self-administered short questionnaire designed by the authors. Satisfaction with TAKE STOCK was assessed using 10-point numerical scales. Across respondents (n−15), average satisfaction scores exceeded 9 out of 10 concerning patient care, staff self-care, decision-making, education, teamwork and identification of equipment issues. Implementation of HoD into the ED is feasible and viewed as beneficial by staff. Implementation toolkits for TAKE STOCK have been requested by 42 additional UK hospitals and ambulance trusts, demonstrating significant interest in its use. Research is now required to formally validate HoD frameworks for use in the ED, and assess whether HoD results in sustained improvements to staff and patient outcomes.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent579-584
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.subjectclinical care
dc.subjectmajor incidents
dc.subjectmajor trauma management
dc.subjectpaediatric emergency medicine
dc.subjectpaediatrics
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectstaff support
dc.subjectEmergency Service, Hospital
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectFeedback
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPatient Care Team
dc.subjectQuality Improvement
dc.titleImplementation of the ‘TAKE STOCK’ Hot Debrief Tool in the ED: a quality improvement project
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000678987500004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue8
plymouth.volume38
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalEmergency Medicine Journal
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2019-208830
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-26
dc.rights.embargodate2021-10-6
dc.identifier.eissn1472-0213
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/emermed-2019-208830
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV