Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeamark, L
dc.contributor.authorBarclay, Y
dc.contributor.authorMarchant, C
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, M
dc.contributor.authorHickson, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T15:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-24
dc.identifier.issn0952-3871
dc.identifier.issn1365-277X
dc.identifier.otherjhn.12860
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/17019
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Evidence suggests that dietary interventions can improve symptoms in people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although most data explore the short‐term (immediate) impact. Data on long‐term (&gt;6 months) impact are limited, especially from primary care settings. The present study aimed to investigate the long‐term effect of dietetic‐led interventions for IBS delivered in primary care.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>A service evaluation of a dietetic‐led IBS clinic was completed, analysing data on symptom severity, stool frequency and consistency, and healthcare input. Data were collected before and immediately after dietary intervention as part of patients’ routine clinical appointments. Long‐term data were collected via a postal questionnaire at least 11 months later.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In total, 211 patients responded to the long‐term follow‐up questionnaire at a median of 13 months (interquartile range 12–16 months) post follow‐up appointment. Of these, 84% had been advised to follow a low FODMAP (i.e., fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols carbohydrates) diet. All symptoms were reported significantly less frequently short term, and all except heartburn and acid regurgitation remained so over the long term. The four most commonly reported bowel symptoms reduced in frequency were abdominal pain (62%), bloating (50%), increased wind (48%) and urgency to open bowels (49%) (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). The percentage of patients reporting satisfactory relief of gut symptoms was 10% at baseline and 55% at long‐term follow‐up (<jats:italic>p </jats:italic>&lt; 0.001). Visits to a general practitioner were reduced (from 96% to 34%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), as were those to the gastroenterologist (from 37% to 12%; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), during the year prior to long‐term follow‐up compared to the year prior to dietary intervention.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with IBS who received dietetic‐led interventions in primary care reported long‐term symptoms improvements that may result in reduced healthcare usage.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent890-900
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectdiet
dc.subjectdietitian
dc.subjectirritable bowel syndrome
dc.subjectlong&#8208
dc.subjectterm effects
dc.subjectprimary care
dc.titleLong‐term symptom severity in people with irritable bowel syndrome following dietetic treatment in primary care: A service evaluation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000632129800001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue5
plymouth.volume34
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jhn.12860
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-18
dc.rights.embargodate2021-4-7
dc.identifier.eissn1365-277X
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/jhn.12860
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV