Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorThompson, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Edward James
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Biological and Marine Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T14:42:09Z
dc.date.available2013-07-15T14:42:09Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier720166en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1570
dc.description.abstract

Longline fishing is the most common elasmobranch capture method in the world, both for commercial fishing, and to a lesser extent for scientific surveys. The capture of an animal on a longline initiates a series of physiological responses designed to promote survivorship in the short term, but if unchecked, can cause reduced individual fitness and/or mortality in the long term. Given widespread declines in shark populations, an improved understanding of the physiological costs of longline capture is needed. The aim of this thesis was to investigate the physiological response of sharks to capture and restraint, to assess novel, non-invasive alternatives to scientific longline surveys, and to generate scientific insight into poorly understood elasmobranch populations in The Bahamas. The results presented herein suggest that some species of shark are able to recover from the physiological stress of capture despite the presence of persistent negative stimuli. Tonic immobility was assessed as a means of generating baseline blood chemistry data, but was found to be inappropriate given that it increases the magnitude of physiological perturbation in the short term. To avoid the stress of capture altogether, Baited Remote Underwater Video Surveys (BRUVS) were considered as a non-invasive alternative to capture based surveys, however, it was concluded that they lack the resolution necessary to answer fine scale demographic questions. For the Caribbean reef shark, longline surveys yielded high resolution data allowing the identification of fine scale spatiotemporal shifts in demographic population structure with minimal cost (mortality). Nevertheless, the ethics of using capture based surveys on sensitive species are questionable when alternative techniques are available. Deep water sharks caught on longline surveys exhibited high mortality rates, however, for these very poorly understood species moribund specimens have great scientific value which in some cases can offset the high ecological costs of the surveys. The results presented in this thesis highlight the on-going need for improved biological and ecological research into the majority of elasmobranch populations, particularly with regards to anthropogenic interactions such as capture. Given the tenuous conservation status of many species, the acquisition of applied, management focused data should remain the priority of elasmobranch scientists.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCape Eleuthera Foundation, Save our Seas Foundation, PADI Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.subjectElasmobranchen_US
dc.subjectStress Physiologyen_US
dc.subjectLongline Captureen_US
dc.subjectCaribbean Reef Sharken_US
dc.subjectBaited Underwater Video Surveysen_US
dc.subjectDeep Wateren_US
dc.subjectThe Bahamasen_US
dc.titleELASMOBRANCH LONGLINE CAPTURE: ECOLOGICAL APPLICATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPACTS AND ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUESen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionFull versionen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/3617


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV