Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLaw, E
dc.contributor.authorAggarwal, R
dc.contributor.authorBuckhurst, Hetal
dc.contributor.authorKasaby, H
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorShum, G
dc.contributor.authorBuckhurst, P
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T08:54:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.issn0886-3350
dc.identifier.issn1873-4502
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15603
dc.descriptionNo embargo required.
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: To examine monocular and binocular visual function and patient-reported outcomes after implantation of multifocal IOLs (mIOLs) or monofocal IOLs, using a rigorous series of clinical assessments. SETTING: BMI Southend Hospital, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomized for bilateral implantation of either a Bi-Flex 677MY mIOL or a Bi-Flex 677AB IOL and were assessed at 3 to 6 months (V1) and 12 to 18 months (V2). Primary outcomes included distance, intermediate, and near logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuities (VAs) and defocus curve profile assessment. Secondary outcomes included reading speed, contrast sensitivity (CS), and the subjective perception of quality of vision. RESULTS: Forty-seven subjects with monofocal IOL and 43 mIOL subjects completed the study. Uncorrected (mIOL: 0.10 ± 0.09 logMAR; IOL: 0.09 ± 0.11 logMAR) and corrected (mIOL: 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR; IOL: 0.01 ± 0.07 logMAR) distance VAs were comparable (P > .05). Uncorrected near VA (mIOL: 0.23 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.55 ± 0.20 logMAR, P < .001) and distance-corrected near VA (mIOL: 0.24 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.54 ± 0.17 logMAR, P < .001) were significantly improved with mIOLs. There was no significant difference in distance-corrected intermediate VA (mIOL: 0.38 ± 0.13 logMAR; IOL: 0.39 ± 0.13 logMAR, P = .431). Defocus curves demonstrated an increased range-of-focus among mIOLs (mIOL: 4.14 ± 1.10 diopter [D]; IOL: 2.57 ± 0.77 D). Pelli-Robson CS was different at V1 (P < .001) but similar by V2 (P = .059). Overall satisfaction was high (>90%) in both groups for distance tasks whereas significantly different for near tasks (mIOL, 18.45 ± 16.53 logUnits; IOL, 55.59 ± 22.52 logUnits). CONCLUSIONS: Uncorrected near visual acuity was demonstrably better with mIOLs and there was greater subjective satisfaction with quality of near vision. Halos reported by the mIOL group were significant compared with the IOL group but did not show an adverse effect on overall satisfaction.

dc.format.extent1020-1020
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectContrast Sensitivity
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLens Implantation, Intraocular
dc.subjectLenses, Intraocular
dc.subjectMultifocal Intraocular Lenses
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectPhacoemulsification
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectProsthesis Design
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.subjectVisual Acuity
dc.titleVisual Function and Subjective Perception of Vision following bilateral implantation of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses: A Randomised Controlled Trial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000579542200015&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume46
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000210
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Admin Group - REF/REF Admin Group - FoH
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Applied Parkinson's Research
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-20
dc.rights.embargodate2020-5-29
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4502
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000210
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV