Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAsthana, Sheena
dc.contributor.authorElston, Julian
dc.contributor.authorGradinger, Felix
dc.contributor.authorByng, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLilley-Woolnough, C
dc.contributor.authorWroe, S
dc.contributor.authorHarman, H
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T19:56:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-24
dc.identifier.issn1463-4236
dc.identifier.issn1477-1128
dc.identifier.othere135
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15363
dc.description.abstract

Aim: To evaluate the impact of ‘holistic’ link-workers on service users’ well-being, activation and frailty, and their use of health and social care services and the associated costs.

Background: UK policy is encouraging social prescribing (SP) as a means to improve well-being, self-care and reduce demand on the NHS and social services. However, the evidence to support this policy is generally weak and poorly conceptualised, particularly in relation to frail, older people and patient activation. Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, an integrated care organisation, commissioned a Well-being Co-ordinator service to support older adults (≥50 years) with complex health needs (≥2 long-term conditions), as part of its service redesign.

Methods: A before-and-after study measuring health and social well-being, activation and frailty at 12 weeks and primary, community and secondary care service use and cost at 12 months prior and after intervention.

Findings: Most of the 86 participants achieved their goals (85%). On average health and well-being, patient activation and frailty showed a statistically significant improvement in mean score. Mean activity increased for all services (some changes were statistically significant). Forty-four per cent of participants saw a decrease in service use or no change. Thirteen high-cost users (>£5000 change in costs) accounted for 59% of the overall cost increase. This was largely due to significant, rapid escalation in morbidity and frailty. Co-ordinators played a valuable key-worker role, improving the continuity of care, reducing isolation and supporting carers. No entry-level participant characteristic was associated with change in well-being or service use. Larger, better conceptualised, controlled studies are needed to strengthen claims of causality and develop national policy in this area.

dc.format.extente135-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/14749
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14749
dc.relation.replaces10026.1/14749
dc.relation.replaceshttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14749
dc.subjectfrailty
dc.subjectholistic link-worker
dc.subjectolder people
dc.subjectpatient activation measure
dc.subjectResearcher-in-Residence
dc.subjectsocial prescribing
dc.titleDoes a social prescribing ‘holistic’ link-worker for older people with complex, multi-morbidity improve well-being and frailty and reduce health and social care use and costs? A 12-month before and after evaluation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000487633400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume20
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPrimary Health Care Research and Development
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1463423619000598
pubs.merge-from10026.1/14749
pubs.merge-fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14749
pubs.merge-from10026.1/14749
pubs.merge-fromhttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14749
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-05
dc.rights.embargodate2020-3-28
dc.identifier.eissn1477-1128
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1017/S1463423619000598
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV