Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMichalsen, A
dc.contributor.authorLong, AC
dc.contributor.authorDeKeyser Ganz, F
dc.contributor.authorWhite, DB
dc.contributor.authorJensen, HI
dc.contributor.authorMetaxa, V
dc.contributor.authorHartog, CS
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.contributor.authorTruog, RD
dc.contributor.authorKesecioglu, J
dc.contributor.authorMahn, AR
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, JR
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T15:25:34Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T15:25:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-04
dc.identifier.issn0090-3493
dc.identifier.issn1530-0293
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14655
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title> <jats:p>There is growing recognition that high-quality care for patients and families in the ICU requires exemplary interprofessional collaboration and communication. One important aspect is how the ICU team makes complex decisions. However, no recommendations have been published on interprofessional shared decision-making. The aim of this project is to use systematic review and normative analysis by experts to examine existing evidence regarding interprofessional shared decision-making, describe its principles and provide ICU clinicians with recommendations regarding its implementation.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Data Sources:</jats:title> <jats:p>We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane databases and used normative analyses to formulate recommendations regarding interprofessional shared decision-making.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Study Selection:</jats:title> <jats:p>Three authors screened titles and abstracts in duplicate.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Data Synthesis:</jats:title> <jats:p>Four papers assessing the effect of interprofessional shared decision-making on quality of care were identified, suggesting that interprofessional shared decision-making is associated with improved processes and outcomes. Five recommendations, largely based on expert opinion, were developed: 1) interprofessional shared decision-making is a collaborative process among clinicians that allows for shared decisions regarding important treatment questions; 2) clinicians should consider engaging in interprofessional shared decision-making to promote the most appropriate and balanced decisions; 3) clinicians and hospitals should implement strategies to foster an ICU climate oriented toward interprofessional shared decision-making; 4) clinicians implementing interprofessional shared decision-making should consider incorporating a structured approach; and 5) further studies are needed to evaluate and improve the quality of interprofessional shared decision-making in ICUs.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Clinicians should consider an interprofessional shared decision-making model that allows for the exchange of information, deliberation, and joint attainment of important treatment decisions.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent1-1
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
dc.subjectintensive care unit team
dc.subjectintensive care units
dc.subjectinterprofessional collaboration
dc.subjectinterprofessional communication
dc.subjectinterprofessional decision-making
dc.subjectshared decision-making
dc.titleInterprofessional Shared Decision-Making in the ICU
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeSystematic Review
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000484224200034&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue9
plymouth.volume47
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCritical Care Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ccm.0000000000003870
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-03
dc.rights.embargodate2020-6-3
dc.identifier.eissn1530-0293
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1097/ccm.0000000000003870
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV