Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGedye, Sharon
dc.contributor.authorDismore, Harriet
dc.contributor.authorMuneer, R
dc.contributor.authorCotton, Debby
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-19T08:00:11Z
dc.date.available2019-06-19T08:00:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-03
dc.identifier.issn0952-8733
dc.identifier.issn1740-3863
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14330
dc.description.abstract

Against a backdrop of rising student complaints in higher education (HE) and debate about students as consumers, increasing attention is turning to institutional processes for dealing with complaints and appeals. This paper draws on a nationwide survey across UK HE to explore the unique experiences of Complaints and Appeals staff. The research provides important new insights into the perceived benefits of student complaints as well as the challenges. The findings indicate a need to change the culture around complaints to help address issues such as time taken to resolve formal complaints, expectations of students and impact on student/staff relationships. Drawing on theoretical models of service failure from the business sector, combined with a co-production model of HE, we conclude with recommendations about how complaints and appeals might be regarded as a learning opportunity leading to improved channels of communication and dissemination, as well as offering continuing professional development opportunities.

dc.format.extent520-539
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjecthigher education
dc.subjectcomplaint
dc.subjectappeal
dc.subjectconsumer
dc.subjectco-production
dc.titleDamage Limitation: Learning Lessons from Complaints and Appeals Staff on the Handling of Student Grievance
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000651818200010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume34
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalHigher Education Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41307-019-00150-4
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-21
dc.rights.embargodate2020-6-2
dc.identifier.eissn1740-3863
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1057/s41307-019-00150-4
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV