Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorDrayson, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorStamboliev, Eugenia
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Art, Design, and Architectureen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-11T14:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10492433en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14295
dc.description.abstract

In this thesis, I reflect on ethical, moral, and agenthood debates around social and humanoid robots in two ways. I focus on how the technological agency of social robots is understood in ethical canons by shifting from moral concerns in Robot Ethics to data-related ethical concerns in Media and Surveillance Studies. I then move to wider debates on morality, agenthood, and agencies in Machine and Computer Ethics research, so as to highlight that social robots, other robots, machines, and algorithmic structures are often moralised but not understood ethically. In that vein, I distinguish between these two terms to point to a wider critique on the anthropocentric and anthropomorphic tendency in ethical streams, so as to view technology from a morality-aligned standpoint. I undertake a critical survey of current ethical streams and, by doing so, I establish a transdisciplinary ethical discussion around social robots and algorithmic agencies.

I undertake this research in two steps. First, I look at the use of humanoid social robots in elderly care, as discussed in Robot Ethics, and expand it with a view from Media and Surveillance Studies on data concern around robots. I hereby examine the social robot and the allocation of its ethical and moral agency as an anthropomorphised and humanoid companion, data tracking device, and Posthumanist ethical network of agencies. This is done to amplify the ethical concerns around its pseudo-agenthood and its potential position as dataveillance. Next, I move on to streams in the Philosophy of Technology (POT) and Machine/Computer Ethics. Here, I discuss concepts on machinic moral agency in digital systems. As I pass from the social robot as a humanoid pseudo-agent towards moralised algorithmic structures, I lay out wider conflicts in morality research streams. Specifically, I address their epistemological simplification and reduction of moral norms to digital code, as well as the increasing dissolvement of accountable agenthood within algorithmic systems.

By creating a transdisciplinary investigation on techno-ethical and techno-moral canons and their agency models, I urge for a holistic ethics that, first, gives a greater focus to human agent accountability and moral concerns in the application of robots and, second, negotiates new moral or social norms around the use of robots or digital media structures. This is aligned with increasing concerns around the growing commodification of health data and the lack of transparency on data ownership and privacy infringement.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subjectRobot Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectPosthumanismen_US
dc.subjectData Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectMachine Moralityen_US
dc.subjectElderly Careen_US
dc.subjectMedia and Surveillance Studiesen_US
dc.subjectAnthropomorphism and Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectDataveillanceen_US
dc.subjectAlgorithmic Autonomy and Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectSocial and Humanoid Robotsen_US
dc.subjectApplied Ethicsen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhDen_US
dc.titleChallenging Robot Morality: An Ethical Debate on Humanoid Companions, Dataveillance, and Algorithmsen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionpublishableen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/389
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/389
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-11T14:01:37Z
dc.rights.embargoperiod6 monthsen_US
dc.type.qualificationDoctorateen_US
rioxxterms.versionNA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV