Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarvey, K.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T09:04:39Z
dc.date.available2019-05-17T09:04:39Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation

Harvey, K. (2015) 'Factors influencing canopy invertebrates in Britain', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 8(1), p. 123-157.

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14088
dc.description.abstract

Canopy research is becoming increasingly important as the extent of woodland habitats decreases and becomes more fragmented. Invertebrates are a diverse group of canopy fauna which are commonly used as bio-indicators to assess the health of woodland. However, current knowledge and understanding of invertebrate abundance and diversity in temperate forest canopies is limited and usually based on individual preliminary studies. In this study, data from six individual studies across eight locations, two in Scotland and six in the south-west of England were analysed to determine differences between tree species: oak (Quercus robur), scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus sylvatica); trapping methods: pitfall, fan and bubble; and regional variation in invertebrate abundance and diversity. After data were collated, sub-samples were selected to run statistical analyses to minimise variation of trapping method, region, season, and tree species. Invertebrates in oak were found to be more diverse and abundant compared to scots pine. Too few samples were conducted in beech trees for a fair comparison. Fan traps proved to be the most effective trapping methods as samples contained the greatest number and diversity of invertebrates. However, consideration of the objective of the sampling needs to be taken into account; if bark-dwelling invertebrates were the subject of investigation then bubble wrap traps would be the most suitable method. No definitive conclusion could be drawn from the regional analysis as tree species could not be kept consistent, oak was only sampled in the south-west of England and scots pine in Scotland. This study highlights the need for consistency and a rigorous and systematic sampling method in order to compare invertebrate communities in a highly dynamic environment.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectcanopyen_US
dc.subjectwoodland habitatsen_US
dc.subjectcanopy faunaen_US
dc.subjectbio-indicatorsen_US
dc.subjectQuercus roburen_US
dc.subjectoaken_US
dc.subjectScots pineen_US
dc.subjectPinus sylvestrisen_US
dc.subjectbeechen_US
dc.subjectFagus sylvaticaen_US
dc.titleFactors influencing canopy invertebrates in Britainen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV