Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, H.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T13:13:15Z
dc.date.available2019-05-13T13:13:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citation

Taylor, H. (2009) 'The experience and perception of concurrent versus retrospective chocolate cravings', The Plymouth Student Scientist, p. 150-169.

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13876
dc.description.abstract

Seventy undergraduate students participated in a self-report study to investigate the perception of concurrent versus retrospective chocolate-related cravings. This study was interested in exploring whether retrospective cravings were reported as more intense than concurrent cravings due to cognitive distortions over time. Results showed that retrospective chocolate cravings were reported as significantly stronger and more urgent (p< .001), and were characterised by more vivid gustatory imagery (p< .025), than concurrent cravings. All other aspects of chocolate craving were reported similarly across groups. This indicates that retrospective measures of chocolate cravings may provide inaccurate representations of the craving experience. This difference may potentially be found with other types of cravings, and for that reason, where possible, concurrent measures of craving should be given priority.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectchocolateen_US
dc.subjectcravingen_US
dc.subjectchocolate cravingen_US
dc.subjectgustatory imageryen_US
dc.subjectcognitive distortionsen_US
dc.titleThe experience and perception of concurrent versus retrospective chocolate cravingsen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume2
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV