Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGorst, T
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorYarrow, K
dc.contributor.authorMarsden, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T10:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-28
dc.identifier.issn1934-1482
dc.identifier.issn1934-1563
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13353
dc.descriptionPublisher’s embargo period: Embargo set on 01.03.2019 by SR (TIS).
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: The foot sole represents a sensory dynamometric map and is essential for balance and gait control. Sensory impairments are common, yet often difficult to quantify in neurological conditions, particularly stroke. A functionally oriented and quantifiable assessment, the Foot Roughness Discrimination Test (FoRDT™), was developed to address these shortcomings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the Foot Roughness Discrimination Test (FoRDT™). DESIGN: Test-retest design. SETTING: Hospital Outpatient. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two people with stroke (mean age 70) at least 3 months after stroke, and 32 healthy, age-matched controls (mean age 70). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Roughness discrimination thresholds were quantified utilising acrylic foot plates, laser-cut to produce graded spatial gratings. Stroke participants were tested on three occasions, and by two different raters. Inter- and intra-rater reliability and agreement were evaluated with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. Convergent validity was evaluated through Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) between the FoRDT™ and the Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (EmNSA). RESULTS: Intra- and inter rater reliability and agreement were excellent (ICC =.86 (95% CI .72-.92) and .90 (95% CI .76 -.96)). Discriminant validity was demonstrated through significant differences in FoRDT™ between stroke and control participants (p< .001). Stroke fallers had statistically significant higher FoRDT™ scores compared to non-fallers (p=.01). Convergent validity was demonstrated through significant and strong correlations (rho) with the Erasmus MC Nottingham Sensory Assessment (r=.69, p<.01). Receiver Operator Curve analysis indicated the novel test to have excellent sensitivity and specificity in predicting the presence of self- reported sensory impairments. Functional Reach test significantly correlated with FoRDT™ (r=.62, p< .01) whilst measures of postural sway and gait speed did not (r=.16-.26, p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: This simple and functionally oriented test of plantar sensation is reliable, valid and clinically feasible for use in an ambulatory, chronic stroke and elderly population. It offers clinicians and researchers a sensitive and robust sensory measure and may further support the evaluation of rehabilitation targeting foot sensation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

dc.format.extent1083-1092
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFoot
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNeurologic Examination
dc.subjectPsychometrics
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSampling Studies
dc.subjectSensation Disorders
dc.subjectStroke
dc.subjectTouch
dc.titleAssessing plantar sensation in the foot using the FOot Roughness Discrimination Test (FoRDT™): a reliability and validity study in stroke.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.typeValidation Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30690894
plymouth.issue10
plymouth.volume11
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPM&R
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pmrj.12085
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Applied Parkinson's Research
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-11
dc.rights.embargodate2020-1-28
dc.identifier.eissn1934-1563
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/pmrj.12085
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV