Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStrain, EMA
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, KA
dc.contributor.authorKienker, S
dc.contributor.authorMorris, R
dc.contributor.authorJarvis, R
dc.contributor.authorColeman, R
dc.contributor.authorBollard, B
dc.contributor.authorFirth, Louise
dc.contributor.authorKnights, Antony
dc.contributor.authorGrabowski, JH
dc.contributor.authorAiroldi, L
dc.contributor.authorChan, BKK
dc.contributor.authorChee, SY
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Z
dc.contributor.authorCoutinho, R
dc.contributor.authorde Menezes, RG
dc.contributor.authorDing, M
dc.contributor.authorDong, Y
dc.contributor.authorFraser, CML
dc.contributor.authorGómez, AG
dc.contributor.authorJuanes, JA
dc.contributor.authorMancuso, P
dc.contributor.authorMessano, LVR
dc.contributor.authorNaval-Xavier, LPD
dc.contributor.authorScyphers, S
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, P
dc.contributor.authorSwearer, S
dc.contributor.authorValdor, PF
dc.contributor.authorWong, JXY
dc.contributor.authorYee, J
dc.contributor.authorBishop, MJ
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T08:52:26Z
dc.date.available2019-01-29T08:52:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-25
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.issn1879-1026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13232
dc.description.abstract

Marine harbours are the focus of a diverse range of activities and subject to multiple anthropogenically induced pressures. Support for environmental management options aimed at improving degraded harbours depends on understanding the factors which influence people's perceptions of harbour environments. We used an online survey, across 12 harbours, to assess sources of variation people's perceptions of harbour health and ecological engineering. We tested the hypotheses: 1) people living near impacted harbours would consider their environment to be more unhealthy and degraded, be more concerned about the environment and supportive of and willing to pay for ecological engineering relative to those living by less impacted harbours, and 2) people with greater connectedness to the harbour would be more concerned about and have greater perceived knowledge of the environment, and be more supportive of, knowledgeable about and willing to pay for ecological engineering, than those with less connectedness. Across twelve locations, the levels of degradation and modification by artificial structures were lower and the concern and knowledge about the environment and ecological engineering were greater in the six Australasian and American than the six European and Asian harbours surveyed. We found that people's perception of harbours as healthy or degraded, but not their concern for the environment, reflected the degree to which harbours were impacted. There was a positive relationship between the percentage of shoreline modified and the extent of support for and people's willingness to pay indirect costs for ecological engineering. At the individual level, measures of connectedness to the harbour environment were good predictors of concern for and perceived knowledge about the environment but not support for and perceived knowledge about ecological engineering. To make informed decisions, it is important that people are empowered with sufficient knowledge of the environmental issues facing their harbour and ecological engineering options.

dc.format.extent1293-1305
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectCoastal armouring
dc.subjectEco-engineering
dc.subjectEstuaries and bays
dc.subjectHuman perceptions
dc.subjectStakeholders
dc.subjectUrbanisation
dc.titleUrban blue: A global analysis of the factors shaping people's perceptions of the marine environment and ecological engineering in harbours.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30677991
plymouth.volume658
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalScience of the Total Environment
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.285
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-18
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-20
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1026
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.285
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV